Browse
Search
Minutes - 04-12-2000
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Minutes - 04-12-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2008 2:17:41 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:46:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/12/2000
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-12-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-12-2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- engage in no noise-causing operations between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. <br />- reduce the allowable ground vibration limit from one inch down to .6 of an inch <br />- monitor with at least two seismographs <br />- meet periodically with neighbors to go over questions ar concerns <br />He said that most of the land around them has been an asphalt plant and they plan to add <br />less than 25 acres to their present site. He said that American Stone Company has been criticized <br />and analyzed by citizens, the press, and others who are looking for same connection between the <br />work at the quarry and the allegations of damage to homes and wells. He said that no one has <br />found anything including an inspection that took place today. In conclusion, he said that American <br />Stone Company operates the quarry responsibly in light of the permits and regulations. If these <br />mitigation measures are adopted, the impacts will be greatly reduced and the operation will be <br />substantially less intrusive in the neighborhood. <br />Chair Carey made reference to a question from a citizen and asked if 36.8 acres were <br />approved for mining in the current quarry. Mr. Badham did not know the answer. <br />Chair Carey noted that Mr. Badham spoke far 15 minutes. <br />Mr. Peter Gordon, Chair of the OWASA Board of Directors, spoke in support of the <br />proposed change to the land use plan. He said that since the idea of using an expanded stone <br />quarry for water storage was first proposed ten years ago, there have been a lot of changes at <br />OWASA. There is a new Executive Director and a completely new Board of Directors. He said <br />that OWASA has very strong support far this proposal. He said that when OWASA was first <br />formed in 1977, its customers used around 4-1/2 million gallons a day. In 1999, there was an <br />average of 9 mgd sold. In projecting future demand, OWASA looked at projections of growth in <br />different sectors of local economy and came up with .18 mgd of growth per year into the future. <br />Under that scenario, in the year 2050, OWASA would be selling 18 mgd. There is a slowing of <br />growth according to their projections. They expect in 2050 the average daily water sales will be <br />between 15-21 mgd. According to the projections, between 2030 and 2050 OWASA will need <br />additional water. One way to meet those demands is to use the stone quarry and the other is to <br />use the Jordan Lake water source. It is highly passible that the Jordan Lake watershed will receive <br />the level of water protection that is in Orange County. One question is how big of a water storage <br />facility is needed. The analyses show that the ideal storage facility would hold around three billion <br />gallons of water, and that is the approximate size of what is held currently in the Cane Creek <br />reservoir. The analyses also show that there is sufficient drainage in the watersheds to usefully <br />have that much storage. OWASA's current supply system gives approximately 15 mgd. If they <br />have excess storage capacity, they would have greater flexibility to maintain their existing facilities, <br />release additional water downstream, etc. <br />He noted that some things have changed since this application was first submitted. They <br />are as follows: <br />1. The mitigation measures that were developed and came out of the mediation process <br />2. The duty to quarry -the original agreement does not specify what size pit American <br />Stone would produce as a result of its quarrying activity. They have agreed to a supplemental set <br />of agreements which would go into effect if this is approved which we believe would greatly <br />increase the likelihood that we would end up with a three billion-gallon facility. There would be <br />checkpoints over the years to be sure we will end up with the size pit we need and assurances this <br />will be done if at all economically feasible. <br />3. OWASA has entered into an agreement in principle to buy the current quarry site from <br />Mrs. Durham. That allows OWASA to tell the neighbors that OWASA will own the site north and <br />west of the road and that in the year 2030 the site will only be used for water supply purposes. <br />This will be a 60-acre lake that will be surrounded by 100 acres of woods and no other activities <br />will take place on this site other than those related to water supply. <br />Chair Carey pointed out that Mr. Gordon spoke for 15 minutes. The opponents will be <br />allowed up to 30 minutes to make their presentation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.