Browse
Search
Minutes - 04-04-2000
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Minutes - 04-04-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2008 2:16:50 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:46:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/4/2000
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-04-2000-0a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-0b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-0c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-12
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-5c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-5d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-5e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-5f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-8b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-8c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-8f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-9b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-9e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
Agenda - 04-04-2000-9f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 04-04-2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
property from the affordable housing inventory, the equity obtained from selling the property must be shared <br />with the County 5a-5a. She made reference to a letter from EmP~WERment stating that the equity sharing <br />should be based on a proportionate share model. On page eight, there is a comparison of doing 5o-5a <br />equity sharing versus a proportionate share model. <br />Chair Carey clarified that the only real distinction between EmP~WERment's proposal and the <br />County's proposal is in who purchases the property. In EmP~WERment's proposal, it does not make a <br />difference who purchases the property, the equity will be proportionate based on the relative contributions of <br />the owner and the County. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that the County would get no interest money for the $3a,aa0 <br />contributed to the loan. She said that $30,aoa was a lot of money to not have any interest money. Also, she <br />said that it was very likely that if a home was sold to anon-qualified buyer, the price would be higher which <br />would make the equity higher. She has a problem with letting a home go non-affordable and sharing the <br />equity proportionately. She said that this was a tremendous taxpayer investment. <br />Myles Presler from EmP~WERment said that he supports Chair Carey's proposal. He said that <br />EmPOWERment's concern about the recommendation was based on the understanding that if the home <br />was sold at all, that 5a% of the appreciation had to be split with the County. He said that EmPUWERment <br />would encourage the County to modify the proposal such that regardless of whether the home is sold to an <br />income-eligible family, that each family has to repay the public investment plus a proportionate share of the <br />appreciation that is built on the property during the tenure of ownership. He apologized for the statement <br />because it was based on a misunderstanding. <br />Commissioner Brown made reference to the Land Trust model and asked what would happen if <br />the land trust went out of business or no longer functioned. <br />County Attorney Geoffrey Gledhill said that when the community land trust that exists now was <br />created, the articles of incorporation called for the property in the event of dissolution of the corporation to go <br />to another non-profit corporation. He has reviewed the documentation and recommended that the articles of <br />incorporation be amended to provide that, upon dissolution, all of the assets would go to a similar purpose <br />non-profit corporation. <br />Commissioner Brown would like to talk about the land trust soon. <br />Jahn Link said that the staff still strongly recommends their proposal on equity sharing because <br />the main intent is to keep the unit affordable. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to approve <br />the Long Term Housing Affordability Policy. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if Mr. Dowling, from the Grange Community Housing Corporation, <br />had anything to add to this discussion. <br />Mr. Dowling said that he feels that the County's proposal is fair. He said that the proposal would <br />entice the seller to sell the unit to an income-qualified buyer. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if there was any mechanism for helping someone who is selling the <br />property to identify a buyer who is qualified. <br />Tara Fikes said that through the right of first refusal, that would give the information that the <br />property is available for the market and anon-profit or the County could purchase it. She said that mast of <br />the non-profit organizations that are involved in first-time homeownership programs have a list of <br />organizations that are involved in affordable housing. <br />Commissioner Gordon clarified that the period of affordability was 99 years for the land trust <br />model and for the new and existing first-time homebuyer programs. She thinks the Board should revisit the <br />impact fee reimbursement issue because in the owner-occupied housing, it is only affordable for 2a years. <br />Tara Fikes said that the section on impact fee reimbursement could be amended to say that the <br />period of affordability would be 99 years. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the return on investment when the property changed hands <br />if the equity was unusually high. <br />John Link said that if the property is sold to a qualified buyer then the unit is retained as <br />affordable and the equity is still going to be fairly low. <br />Geoff Gledhill said that the objective was to keep the housing affordable, and if the marketplace <br />will do it, then the County does not have to. <br />Commissioner Brown would like to include in the motion that the 2a-year period of affordability in <br />the impact fee reimbursement would be changed to 99 years. She feels that the County should come up <br />with a revolving fund to go along with this program. She would like the staff to came back with <br />recommendations for a revolving fund at the housing work session. <br />Commissioner Gordon suggested including in the motion that this program would be evaluated <br />within two years with a report of all of the transactions that take place. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.