Browse
Search
Minutes - 02-28-2000
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Minutes - 02-28-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 4:03:33 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:45:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/28/2000
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-28-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 02-28-2000
Agenda - 02-28-2000 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 02-28-2000
Agenda - 02-28-2000 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 02-28-2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
protected by the quality of road that is being constructed. She asked for more information on the process of <br />getting an engineer to evaluate the road standards and Craig Benedict described this process. <br />Chair Carey asked if there were some procedural problems if the process for the concept plan is <br />changed and the County Commissioners approve the concept plan. <br />Geoffrey Gledhill said that it is not uncommon in administrative law to do this kind of process. <br />He thinks the objective of the Planning staff is to move non-advisory functions of the Planning Board to the <br />County Commissioners. <br />Chair Carey said that he feels that the Planning Board staff should review the project and not the <br />Board of County Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to the private road justification and asked if there is <br />something along that line for existing roads. She said that this regulation could result in a loss of trees which <br />would not be the best thing for the County. <br />Craig Benedict said that he would work with the Attorney on language to address the issue for <br />existing roads. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that he fails to see anything wonderful about roads that are gravel <br />where everything is covered with dust. He asked if there was any County staff that could certify the roads as <br />meeting state standards. <br />Craig Benedict said that for private roads, there is not any qualified staff to certify the roads. He <br />said that DOT is now coming to the Development Review Committee on a biweekly basis to discuss the road <br />standards. <br />Chair Barrows made reference to the subdivision approval and said that it sounds like the <br />Planning Board is being eliminated at the concept stage, but would be brought in at the preliminary stage. <br />Craig Benedict said that the Planning Board would definitely be brought in at the preliminary <br />stage. <br />Chair Barrows said that it seems like the Planning staff is taking charge of the plans and that it is <br />a big change from the current process. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that if the intent is to make the standards so precise that it is a <br />matter of determination only, it could be a good thing. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that if something is missed in the concept plan stage and the first <br />time that any policy maker sees it is at the preliminary level, it is too late. He would like to see apolicy- <br />minded body review the plan, either the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Scott Radway said that he strongly supports going from two years to ten years for the minor <br />subdivisions. He made reference to the 50-foot right of way and said that right now with any roadway width, <br />if no curbs are used, 42 to 47 feet have already been used when everything is counted. He said that the 50- <br />faot envelope is pushed with the swell system. He made reference to the process of the plan approval and <br />said that the County should be really careful in the language for this process. He explained the buy right <br />process. <br />Geoffrey Gledhill said that he did not know whether this proposal would eliminate the buy right. <br />He said that right now the developer has the option of choosing either the flexible or the conventional plan. <br />Commissioner Brown said that it was her perspective that the hope was to go more and more <br />toward flexible design standards. <br />Bob Strayhorn said that he is concerned about the process of waiting another ten years to <br />subdivide. He asked if there was a list of people who have benefited from minor subdivisions and not <br />abused them. <br />Craig Benedict said that the minor subdivision process would still be available as long as it did <br />not exceed five lots in a ten-year period. He said that about 38% of the lots that are subdivided in Orange <br />County are minor subdivisions. <br />MOTION <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to refer the <br />proposed amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of <br />Commissioners no sooner than May 3, 2000. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />2. AMENDMENTS REGARDING THE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROADS IN ORANGE <br />COUNTY <br />Craig Benedict said that the County is in the process of developing a Comprehensive Plan, and <br />transportation is a very important basis of that plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.