Orange County NC Website
was amended to reflect the changes as described above. <br />d. (non-Vehicular Access) <br />This item has to do with anon-vehicular access line. This also can be used in residential and <br />non-residential subdivisions so that when the subdivisions are prepared the approved access points can be <br />put on the subdivision plat. <br />e. Section II DEFINITIONS <br />When lots are subdivided, very often the access points are changed to a road that should not <br />have additional traffic. The amendment would not allow someone to shift the access point to burden the <br />roads that are not scheduled for a higher capacity system. <br />Appendix A Orange County Private Road Standards <br />Craig Benedict made reference to private road standards and said that the staff is suggesting a <br />decrease in the amount of lots that are allowed on a private road from a 25-lot maximum to a 1 a-lot <br />maximum. He described the negative things that have occurred as a result of the 25-lot maximum regulation <br />for private roads. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to the grange County private road standards and asked <br />what would happen to existing private roads if someone wanted to put a house on an existing lot or split the <br />lot into two lots. <br />Craig Benedict said that each of the subdivisions that have private road standards has <br />something in their homeowner's association documents that address additional lots being subdivided on the <br />road. In some cases, the cost is borne by the subdivision. <br />Geoffrey Gledhill said that the upgrade of the road is required to service the new subdivided lots. <br />Once the upgrade is done, then all of the lots in the subdivision are jointly responsible for maintaining the <br />road to the upgraded standard. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the 18-foot travel way and asked if that included the <br />swells or if it was just the actual road surface. <br />Craig Benedict said that 18 feet was just the actual road surface and that the impermeability that <br />comes forward from both public and private roads still is counted as the entire roadway. After the swell goes <br />up to the 50-foot area, then there is a certain amount of impervious that would be counted in the remaining <br />5g feet. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if it was the same amount of shoulder that must be cleared <br />regardless of whether it is a public or private road <br />Craig Benedict said that typically there is the surface course, afour-foot swell down and afour- <br />foot swell up and then whatever can be preserved after that. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to page 13 and read the first paragraph which says, <br />"Private roads serving more than 10 lots or dwelling units may be permitted only if constructed to NCD~T <br />public road standards," and said that this contradicts everything which has gone before it. <br />Craig Benedict said that this statement could be deleted. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to Class A versus Class B private roads and asked if the <br />staff has looked into the cost of hiring a professional engineer. <br />Craig Benedict said that the staff has checked into the costs for engineers and the determination <br />of one road over the other is negligible in cost because it is the engineer's time to go out and see if the road <br />meets the standards. He said that one of the most important things is if the County is going to continue to <br />have private roadways, the hazards of living on a private road should be reduced as much as possible by <br />having the road certified to the standards. He said that drainage is the key for private roads, and that is <br />where the biggest failing is. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that DOT had set up a committee to work on subdivision standards <br />and he is concerned that the County is locking themselves in and not allowing any flexibility. He is <br />concerned that there would be no allowance if there were some significant natural resource or rural <br />characteristic of the property that might be enhanced by having a private road as opposed to a public road. <br />He questions eliminating flexibility in the concept plan amendments. He would prefer that the plan be <br />presented for comment to the Planning Board and the County Commissioners before the staff makes a <br />ruling. <br />Craig Benedict said that some of the language could be changed to allow for some flexibility. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he would like to have incentives for people to do things the way <br />the County would want them to, not making it as a right, but a privilege. <br />Commissioner Brown asked if the Planning staff could specify the reasons far modifications of <br />the regulations. <br />Craig Benedict said that a checklist could be implemented and reviewed to be sure the private <br />road standards meet the goals of the Board of County Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Brown said that she would like the consumer, the one buying the lots, to be <br />