Browse
Search
Minutes - 19991122
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Minutes - 19991122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 4:28:01 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:44:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/22/1999
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-22-1999
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 11-22-1999
Agenda - 11-22-1999 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 11-22-1999
Agenda - 11-22-1999 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 11-22-1999
Agenda - 11-22-1999 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 11-22-1999
Agenda - 11-22-1999 - 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 11-22-1999
Agenda - 11-22-1999 - 5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 11-22-1999
Agenda - 11-22-1999 - 6
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 11-22-1999
Agenda - 11-22-1999 - 7
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 11-22-1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> 1 Chair Gordon asked about the topography lines on Attachment 1 and why they <br /> 2 crossed each other. <br /> 3 Gayle Wilson said that this topography map shows lines of the surface and the <br /> 4 groundwater. <br /> 5 In answer to a question from Commissioner Jacobs, Gayle Wilson said that part <br /> 6 of the SUP has an access easement through the Neville Tract to the Greene Tract and <br /> 7 accesses from Eubanks Road parallel with the landfill property line. <br /> 8 Commissioner Jacobs asked about the area in the southwestern corner and what <br /> 9 could be sited there if it was buffered to the south and west. <br /> 10 Gayle Wilson said that that piece of land could be useful. He said that with the <br /> 11 200-foot buffer that the Town of Chapel Hill proposed, that whole area is essentially useful. <br /> 12 Commissioner Brown said that it would seem to her in the future that any Board <br /> 13 that wanted to use the Greene Tract could be guided by the cultural inventory on which part <br /> 14 could be used. She would rather base her decision on the specific acreage from the cultural <br /> 15 inventory instead of the number of feet of buffer. <br /> 16 Chair Gordon asked Commissioner Brown to explain the history of the railroad <br /> 17 access. <br /> 18 Commissioner Brown said that the railroad access is an asset of the landfill. In <br /> 19 the negotiations the Greene Tract should have gone, in her opinion, to whoever was going to <br /> 20 fully manage the landfill operations. She said that the Town of Chapel Hill did not feel that the <br /> 21 Greene Tract should be given to the County intact. She said that this difference of opinion has <br /> 22 given the County the opportunity to do this evaluation. She feels that it is important that the <br /> 23 County maintain access to the railroad corridor. <br /> 24 Commissioner Carey feels that it is important to depend on the survey being <br /> 25 done but feels the County should start with what has been presented for the 60 acres and that <br /> 26 the 100-foot buffer, with the 30-foot buffer around the Neville Tract, should be maintained to <br /> 27 protect the neighbors. The only question is what can be done with the remaining portion outside <br /> 28 of this 60 acres and that will depend on the survey. <br /> 29 Commissioner Jacobs said that he was told that if there were significant buffers, <br /> 30 such as 200 feet, that pushed the activity to one specific area, that area would likely be heavily <br /> 31 forested now. He said that this might not be an area where the County would want to do <br /> 32 anything. He also talked to a couple of Chapel Hill elected officials who said that they did not <br /> 33 really consider the ramifications of what the 200-foot buffer would do. It was just proposed and it <br /> 34 sounded good. <br /> 35 In response to a concern expressed by Commissioner Carey, Gayle Wilson said <br /> 36 that the survey would be done on the entire Greene Tract. <br /> 37 Chair Gordon asked if, given the Duke Power easement, would the property <br /> 38 south of it have to be used in order for the County to have access to the railroad. <br /> 39 John Link asked Craig Benedict if there could not be a final decision on the 60 <br /> 40 acres and still pursue the timetable. <br /> 41 Planning Director Craig Benedict said that the zoning application must be for a <br /> 42 specific site. He said that the first thing to determine is when the joint public hearing will be <br /> 43 held. He said that the difference between the Chapel Hill and the County process is that Chapel <br /> 44 Hill will have a Planning Board and Commission review before the joint public hearing. The <br /> 45 County will have the Planning Board and Commission review after the joint public hearing. He <br /> 46 distributed a schedule indicating that another meeting will have to be scheduled between March <br /> 47 13-17 for Board of County Commissioners' review and adoption of the rezoning of the Greene <br /> 48 tract. He explained that the property needs to be rezoned from a Rural Transition to a Materials <br /> 49 Handling designation. However, to justify the use of the property as a solid waste management <br /> 50 facility, there needs to be a specific request from Gayle Wilson to Chapel Hill after the rezoning <br /> 51 is complete. <br /> 52 Geoffrey Gledhill said that it is possible to move forward with designating the <br /> 53 entire 169 acres knowing that the Board is going to back off to 60 acres as stipulated in the <br /> 54 Interlocal Agreement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.