Browse
Search
Minutes - 19991012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Minutes - 19991012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 12:59:18 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:43:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/12/1999
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-12-1999
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 10-12-1999
Agenda - 10-12-1999 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 10-12-1999
Agenda - 10-12-1999 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 10-12-1999
Agenda - 10-12-1999 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 10-12-1999
Agenda - 10-12-1999 - 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 10-12-1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3) Third, Orange Alamance Water is at capacity, with 80 percent of its water going west <br />of Buckhorn Road. Are we to explore options for dealing with water availability in our <br />planning efforts? <br />Chair Gordon said that she thought that it was in the bond brochure that service would <br />be provided to Efland consumers. <br />Craig Benedict said that 1.2 million dollars has to be used to service the people of <br />Efland. The question should be modified to include whether the money should be leveraged to <br />expand the area for water and sewer services to possibly pick up some of the EDDs in the <br />general area. He said that a larger water and sewer system is typically more financially feasible <br />and could lower the rates for everyone in the general area. <br />Craig Benedict made a brief presentation on the Buckhorn Road Economic Development <br />District. He said that at this time, EDDs have primary and secondary sections. Primary means <br />that it is all non-residential, industrial, manufacturing, and commercial. Secondary means that <br />residential uses are allowed. The Board is to consider whether the uses within the EDDs should <br />be broken down to a few different categories (question 2). He said that when the EDD was first <br />proposed in the Buckhorn Road area, it was just north of 1-85, and then it was further modified <br />to include the area just south of 1-85. This issue was brought up because one of the property <br />owners said that there could be no industrial development because there was no water and <br />sewer. At this time, Mebane does not plan to extend water and sewer systems east of <br />Buckhorn Road. He said that Orange Alamance has used up all of the allocations from the <br />reservoirs and cannot extend the system any further. He said that if there was going to be <br />higher residential density, it should be near the interstate where there is water and sewer. <br />Chair Gordon would like some pros and cons of each scenario. She feels there needs to <br />be more structure to the decision making. Craig Benedict will come back to the board with <br />some pros and cons for each question. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis asked for an update on the history of the Efland sewer line and <br />the proposed expenditure for the 1.2 million dollars. He feels this needs to be thought out very <br />carefully. He noted that the 1.2 million dollars would only take care of the remainder of phase <br />one and all of phase two, and there are four phases. <br />John Link said that if a utility line is run past someone's house, the homeowner is <br />charged the minimum whether or not they use it. It needs to be made clear as the County <br />Commissioners make decisions on expanding this utility that it would be run as a utility in the <br />future. <br />Commissioner Carey would like to leverage the 1.2 million dollars to help provide water <br />and sewer to the EDD. He said that inter-basin transfers should be limited. <br />Commissioner Jacobs feels that the 1.2 million dollars should be leveraged to serve the <br />EDD, but water needs to be addressed along with sewer. He asked why the Orange Alamance <br />water system is shipping water to another drainage basin. He would like to get more information <br />about whether the Orange Alamance Water System could be acquired or influenced to keep its <br />water within the basin. <br />Commissioner Brown asked what the people of Efland think. Providing water and sewer <br />could change Efland. She does not think Efland is interested in the impact of increased <br />development. She thinks that the County's service boundary needs to be considered. <br />Regarding the Efland Small Area Plan, she asked if that was in the goals. <br />Craig Benedict said that there are three goals wrapped into one that addressed this <br />concern. This issue is an opportunity to take a look at the small area plan. <br />Commissioner Brown said that Efland is the biggest area for affordable housing. She <br />asked about the applications for septic tanks in the developments in Efland. <br />Craig Benedict said that it is difficult to get an answer. A sewer extension policy on who <br />uses the sewer system and who does not is a very delicate issue. <br />Commissioner Brown feels it is very important to decide what is going to be done.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.