Browse
Search
Minutes - 19990930
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Minutes - 19990930
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:01:23 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:43:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/30/1999
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-30-1999
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 09-30-1999
Agenda - 09-30-1999 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 09-30-1999
Agenda - 09-30-1999 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 09-30-1999
Agenda - 09-30-1999 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 09-30-1999
Agenda - 09-30-1999 - 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 09-30-1999
Agenda - 09-30-1999 - Memo
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 09-30-1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
used and noted that the residential fiscal impact model is in need of an update. Also, <br />there are some assumptions that also need an update like the differentiation between <br />multi-family, single-family, townhouses, student generation rates, and the value of <br />housing. He mentioned that if the residential analysis for Corbin Downs was in the <br />County it would show a positive cash flow. The apartment complex would show a <br />negative cash flow. When the single-family, adult care, and assisted living are added to <br />the apartment complex, there would be a positive cash flow. The assumed taxable value <br />of the units that were given by the developer were reasonable for residential. However, <br />Craig Benedict felt that some of the others were unreasonably high. Even with those <br />high numbers there was only a marginal surplus for the County. These figures do not <br />account for capital expenditures; for example, what it would cost to provide a school. He <br />referred to Table #1 and Table #2. He said that table #1 shows another way to figure <br />the residential fiscal impact. He discussed items 1-9. This model takes all of the <br />expenditures in those various departments (items 1-9) and calculates the cost per <br />person in the entire County. A per capita cost is then calculated for what it takes to do <br />the community maintenance function. After adding this together approximately $1,293 <br />per person would be spent to allow the County to provide its services to each individual <br />that would be in this subdivision. <br />Commissioner Carey asked if any Public Works was used. <br />Craig Benedict said that Public Works was not used. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if Public Works counted solid waste. <br />Craig Benedict said it would be a separate provision eventually. He said that <br />looking at it now, he does not think the $76 should be in there. <br />John Link said it is not a problem because part of Public Works includes the cost <br />of maintaining the solid waste collection centers. <br />The total cost to provide services to the resident population of this project would <br />be over two million dollars. The calculated amount of residents for this project is 1,938 <br />people. He explained that the non-resident population includes employees who come to <br />work, people who come to visit, patrons, and how much traffic is generated from those <br />employees. He said the amount of traffic that would be generated from this project <br />would be approximately 35,000 trips per day. When the non-residential population is <br />added to the residential population, the cost is increased to three million dollars. He said <br />that a lot of these calculations are assumptions, but he tried to be as realistic as possible <br />with the material that was available. Table #2 shows how much revenue would come <br />from various sources from this project. The County receives revenue from those <br />categories from this table. He used only revenue that the County would receive given <br />that this project would be in Hillsborough. The total amount of revenue is approximately <br />three million dollars. The figures from the expenditures and the revenue came out very <br />close. There is only a $4,000 surplus. This is assuming that the values are correct and <br />that there is complete build out. Some of the values of the retail, office, industrial, and <br />hotel properties are in line. The hotel value that was calculated at two million dollars an <br />acre for five acres is unrealistic. He used the values that were provided by the <br />developer. If those values all show up and they build 1.6 million square feet of non- <br />residential property, and they build all of the residential, there would almost be a wash <br />financially. <br />Chair Gordon asked if it was operating and not capital. <br />Craig Benedict said it is not capital. The road infrastructure is the other capital <br />item, and that would be handled by the developer and then turned over to NCDOT in <br />some manner. The cost for water and sewer lines are included in an agreement <br />between the developer and the Town of Hillsborough. There is a deficit in the revenues <br />at first for the water and sewer, but eventually it becomes very profitable because of the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.