Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
complicated issue because there is a serious and valid concern among the two (2) managers to have this <br />project on-line by January 1, 2000. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Carey to accept <br />all proposed changes. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to <br />change "advisory commission" to "advisory board". <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />On pages 6 and 7, there is reference to fees that can be charged by the Board of County <br />Commissioners and one other party to the agreement (both governmental fees and other fees). <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to accept <br />the fee arrangement. <br />VOTE: AFFIRMED: Commissioners Gordon, Brown, Carey, and Halkiotis <br />OPPOSED: Commissioner Jacobs <br />On pages where there are two (2) versions, the reimbursement amount is left in place in <br />version B. Version A states "'Reimbursement Amount means, (1) in the case of disposition to a North <br />Carolina local government that is also a Party, (1) $608,823.00, being the original purchase price of the <br />Greene Tract, multiplied (b) by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of whole acres of the <br />Greene Tract being disposed and the denominator of which is 169, plus (c) uncompounded interest on the <br />product of (a) and (b) at the annual rate of 6.00 percent from March 30, 1984, to the effective date of any <br />disposition, and (2) in the case of any other disposition, the greater of either (1) the Reimbursement Amount <br />to a North Carolina local government that is also a Party, or (b) the net proceeds of a sale after the costs of <br />the sale are paid". The definition of reimbursement amount is on the pink sheet as distributed and on page <br />18, at the bottom, and continues at the top of page 19 of the yellow sheet, with pink being the most recent <br />version. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Carey to accept <br />the version B language in response to reimbursement which provides for negotiation of the amounts, <br />leaving it to the process, and asking that Chapel Hill trust that process in how the remaining 109 acres will <br />be used. <br />At the bottom of page 9, there would not be a definition included in the document and there <br />would be a bargaining issue. Chair Gordon stated that she would prefer to see the reimbursement amount <br />put in to eliminate a problem before the agreement is signed. <br />Commissioner Brown questioned whether any of these versions directly address the issue if <br />ever the Greene Tract is privately sold. Attorney Gledhill said the last four (4) lines on the pink sheet <br />address that issue. <br />Commissioner Carey stated that the comments he has heard have to do with the process. <br />VOTE: AFFIRMED: Commissioners Carey and Jacobs <br />OPPOSED: Commissioners Gordon, Brown, and Halkiotis <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to accept <br />version A. <br />VOTE: AFFIRMED: Commissioners Gordon, Brown, and Halkiotis <br />OPPOSED: Commissioners Carey and Jacobs <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to accept <br />the rest of the document, approving pages 9 and 10. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />The last changes are on page 24 regarding the advisory board. The first change under <br />subsection G is that the advisory board would take up such matters that any governing board the County