Browse
Search
Minutes - 19990630
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Minutes - 19990630
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:09:19 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:42:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/30/1999
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-30-1999
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 10a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 10b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 10c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 10d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 8a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 8b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 8c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 8d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 9a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 9b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 9c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 9d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 9e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
Agenda - 06-30-1999 - 9f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 06-30-1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d. Adoption of the 1999-2000 County Commissioners' Goal -Affordable Housing <br />The Board approved a goal to promote a collaborative and effective approach for addressing <br />affordable housing in Orange County which ensures long-term affordability. The Board has expressed a <br />continuing interest in promoting a collaborative, countywide approach to addressing the affordable housing <br />problem in Orange County. The preparation of the Consolidated Housing Plan for Orange County <br />developed in 1995 as a federal requirement has provided a framework for this collaboration. The 1995 Plan <br />is a five-year plan which expires in June 2000, at which time, a new action plan will need to be developed. <br />VOTE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA: UNANIMOUS <br />9. ITEMS FOR DECISION - REGULAR AGENDA <br />a. Evaluation Instrument for County Manager <br />The Board considered a response to the draft format and content of a revised evaluation <br />instrument for the County Manager. <br />Dr. Kurt Jenne of the Institute of Government presented a draft evaluation instrument for the <br />Board's review and comment. This evaluation instrument consisted of three (3) major parts. <br />Part One deals with the knowledge and skills necessary for effective local government <br />management. It contains criteria that are used to measure how well the County Manager carries out the <br />tasks for which he/she is responsible. These criteria generally reflect the knowledge and skills the County <br />Manager brings to the job. They should reflect, for the most part, what the Commissioners would expect of <br />the County Manager, no matter what specific tasks it assigned in a given year, even though the <br />Commissioners did not specifically adopt or communicate these to the County Manager at the beginning of <br />the evaluation period. <br />Part Two deals with the management of the Commissioners' priorities for the current year. It <br />contains specific objectives that the Commissioners assigned to the County Manager when it adopted the <br />current year's budget. These criteria reflect outcomes or results for which the Commissioners hold the <br />County Manager responsible. One item to consider when rating the County Manager's performance by <br />these objectives in February, prior to the anniversary date, is that progress up until that time would be for six <br />(6) out of the 12 months of the fiscal year. <br />Part Three deals with summary comments on the County Manager's performance. It <br />provides the opportunity to express general observations about the County Manager's overall performance <br />as a whole and gives the Commissioners a place to make an overall rating. <br />For each criterion in the evaluation, the Commissioners are asked to rate the County <br />Manager on a scale from one (1) to five (5), according to how well he/she has met expectations for that <br />criterion. There are three (3) reference points on the scale which are: <br />Exceeds Expectations (5): The County Manager's performance clearly exceeds the <br />Commissioners' expectations, even of somebody fully qualified to do the job of Orange County Manager. <br />Meets Expectations (3): The County Manager's performance meets your <br />expectations of someone fully qualified to do the job. <br />Does Not Meet Expectations (1): The County Manager's performance does not meet <br />the Commissioners' expectations of someone fully qualified to do the job and needs to significantly improve. <br />Beside the rating scale for each criterion is a place to mark Unable to Rate. This option is <br />offered to the Commissioners so they are not forced to make a numerical rating when it is felt that there is <br />not enough valid information with which to make a fair judgment. <br />Dr. Jenne said that he has a list of questions for the Board's written response that will be <br />helpful to both him and the County Manager in developing a final draft for the Board's final review and <br />approval after the summer break. Dr. Jenne is interested in knowing if this is the general approach that the <br />Board wishes to take. He noted that for most boards, this evaluation instrument is not static, but changes <br />from year-to-year, based on specific objectives. Dr. Jenne stated he would include all comments in the <br />final document. He also made reference to the Manager's evaluation of other staff. He believes that the <br />Board can state this in a general way and that during the course of the evaluation, the Board can go into
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.