Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 06-07-2011
>
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2011 3:50:39 PM
Creation date
6/3/2011 3:50:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/7/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-07-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
26 <br />Appendix A - Definition of Terms <br />• Energy demands, directly compared to "reference" energy demands generated by means of <br />simulation tools. <br />Walk-through or preliminary audit: The preliminary audit (altematively called a simple audit, screening <br />audit orwalk-through audit) is the simplest and quickest type of audit. It involves minimal interviews with <br />site-operating personnel, a brief review of facility utility bills and other operating data, and awalk-through <br />of the facility to become familiar with the building operation and to identify any glaring areas of energy <br />waste or inefficiency. <br />Typically, only major problem areas will be covered during this type of audit. Corrective measures are <br />briefly described, and quick estimates of implementation cost, potential operating cost savings, and <br />simple payback periods are provided. A list of energy conservation measures (ECMs, or energy <br />conservation opportunities, ECOs) requiring further consideration is also provided. This level of detail, <br />while not sufficient for reaching a final decision on implementing proposed measure, is adequate to <br />prioritize energy-efficiency projects and to determine the need for a more detailed audit. <br />General Audit: The general audit (alternatively called amini-audit, site energy audit or detailed energy <br />audit or complete site energy audit) expands on the preliminary audit described above by collecting more <br />detailed information about facility operation and by performing a more detailed evaluation of energy <br />conservation measures. Utility bills are collected fora 12 to 36 month period to allow the auditor to <br />evaluate the facility's energy/demand rate structures and energy usage profiles. If interval meter data is <br />available, the detailed energy profiles that such data makes possible will typically be analyzed for signs of <br />energy waste. Additional metering of specific energy-consuming systems is often performed to <br />supplement utility data. In-depth interviews with facility operating personnel are conducted to provide a <br />better understanding of major energy consuming systems and to gain insight into short and longer term <br />energy consumption patterns. This type of audit will be able to identify all energy-conservation measures <br />appropriate for the facility, given its operating parameters. A detailed financial analysis is performed for <br />each measure based on detailed implementation cost estimates, site-specific operating cost savings, and <br />the customer's investment criteria. Sufficient detail is provided to justify project implementation. <br />Investment-grade audit: In most corporate settings, upgrades to a facility's energy infrastructure must <br />compete for capital funding with non~nergy-related investments. Both energy and non-energy <br />investments are rated on a single set of financial criteria that generally stress the expected return on <br />investment (ROI). The projected operating savings -from the implementation of energy projects must be <br />developed such that they provide a high level of confidence. In fact, investors often demand guaranteed <br />savings. The investment-grade audit expands on the detailed audit described above and relies on a <br />complete engineering study in order to detail technical and economical issues necessary to justify the <br />investment related to the transformations.2a <br />Energv reduction: Reductions in the amount of energy' (electricity, natural gas, etc.) used by a piece of <br />equipment or an entire system of facility may or may not lead to a reduction in energy billings. Increases <br />in the unit cost of energy (kWh, therms) over time may outweigh savings from reduced energy use. <br />However, billing increase would have been substantially greater had reduction measures not been taken. <br />Energv Star ~ Portfolio Manager: Energy Star offers a proven energy management strategy that helps <br />in measuring current energy performance, setting goals, tracking savings, and rewarding improvements. <br />EPA provides an innovative energy performance rating system which businesses have already used for <br />more than 130,000 buildings across the country. EPA also recognizes top performing buildings with the <br />ENERGY STAR designation. <br />Portfolio Manager is an interactive energy management tool that allows you to track and assess energy <br />and water consumption across your entire portfolio of buildings in a secure online environment. Portfolio <br />Manager can help you set priorities, identify under-performing buildings, verify efficiency improvements, <br />and receive EPA recognition for superior energy performance. <br />24 http://en.wikiyedia.orQ/wiki/Ener~y audit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.