Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 06-07-2011
>
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2011 3:50:39 PM
Creation date
6/3/2011 3:50:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/7/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-07-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
25 <br />Appendix A - Definition of Terms <br />Example: On a summer day the high was 90 degrees and the low was 70 degrees. The average temperature was 80 <br />degrees (90 + 70 = 160 / 2 = 80). The average temperature of 80 minus the base temperature of 65 yields 15 cooling <br />degree days (80 - 65 = 15). Cooling degree days can be used to calculate the amount of energy needed to cool <br />homes or businesses. <br />Example: On a winter day the high was 40 degrees and the low was 20 degrees. The average temperature was 30 <br />degrees (40 + 20 = 60 / 2 = 30). The base temperature of 65 minus the average temperature of 20 yields 45 heating <br />degree days (65 - 20 = 40). Heating degree days can be used to calculate the amount of energy needed to heat <br />homes or businesses.22 <br />Energy audit: An energy audit is an inspection, survey and analysis of energy flows for energy <br />conservation in a building, process or system to reduce the amount of energy input into the system <br />without negatively affecting the output(s). Beyond simply identifying the sources of energy use, an <br />energy audit seeks to prioritize the energy uses according to the greatest to least cost effective <br />opportunities for energy savings.23 <br />Common typesllevels of energy audits are distinguished below, although the actual tasks performed and <br />level of effort may vary with the consultant providing services under these broad headings. <br />Generally, four levels of analysis can be outlined (ASHRAE): <br />• Level 0 -Benchmarking: This first analysis consists of a preliminary Whole Building Energy Use <br />(WBEU) analysis based on the analysis of the historic utility use and costs and the comparison of <br />the performances of the buildings to those of similar buildings. This benchmarking of the studied <br />installation allows determining if further analysis is required; <br />Level I -Walk-through audit: Preliminary analysis made to assess building energy efficiency to <br />identify simple and low-cost improvements but also a list of energy conservation measures <br />(ECMs, or energy conservation opportunities, ECOs) to orient the future detailed audit. This <br />inspection is based on visual verifications, study of installed equipment and operating data and <br />detailed analysis of recorded energy consumption collected during the benchmarking phase; <br />• Level.ll -Detailed/General energy audit: Based on the results of the pre-audit, this type of energy <br />audit consists in energy use survey in order to provide a comprehensive analysis of the studied <br />installation, a more detailed analysis of the facility, a breakdown of the energy use and a first <br />quantitative evaluation of the ECOs/ECMs selected to correct the defects or improve the existing <br />installation. This level of analysis can involve advanced on-site measurements and sophisticated <br />computer based simulation tools to evaluate precisely the selected energy retrofits; <br />• Level III -Investment-Grade audit: Detailed Analysis of Capital-Intensive Modifications focusing <br />on potential costly ECOs requiring rigorous engineering study. <br />Benchmarking: The impossibility of describing all possible situations that might be encountered during an <br />audit means that it is necessary to find a way of describing what constitutes good, average and bad <br />energy performance across a range of situations. The aim of benchmarking is to answer this question. <br />Benchmarking mainly consists in comparing the measured consumption with reference consumption ofi <br />other similar buildings or generated by simulation tools to identify excessive or unacceptable running <br />costs. As mentioned- before, benchmarking is also necessary to identify buildings presenting interesting <br />energy saving potential. An important issue in benchmarking is the use of performance indexes to <br />characterize the building. <br />These indexes can be: <br />• Comfort indexes, comparing the actual comfort conditions to the comfort requirements; <br />• Energy indexes, consisting in energy demands divided by heated/conditioned area, allowing <br />comparison with reference values of the indexes coming from regulation or similar buildings; <br />22 http://www.erh.noaa.gov/rah/faq/ <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.