Orange County NC Website
in their planning jurisdiction and they want to exclude the two uses, mixed solid waste and C&D, <br />it should be clear as to what uses would be permitted. <br />Commissioner Carey would not mind adding a list of permitted uses, but he does not <br />want to make the list inclusive. <br />Chair Gordon feels that it is important to talk about zoning and permitted uses. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the last sentence of #1 in the report of last <br />night's meeting, which states, "in addition, state that no non-solid waste management use could <br />be made of the 60-acre portion without the agreement of the three current co-owners." He said <br />that the County would not really own the 60 acres if the other two jurisdictions had to agree on <br />what was done with the land. He did not think this should be approved. <br />Chair Gordon said that she feels this needs to go back to a smaller group. <br />Bob Jessup said that the Town Council agreed that the Mayor is not to sign the <br />agreement until these three points are incorporated into the agreement. The Chapel Hill Town <br />Council does want the transfer to take place. The Council meets next Monday and if something <br />can be worked out between now and then, he feels that the Town Council would support the <br />County continuing to work on the transition plan. <br />Chair Gordon asked if the Board wanted the staff to continue working on this transition. <br />She still feels that there should be a date by which the agreement would be signed or the <br />January 1, 2000 deadline would not be met. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that a date was put in the proposed interlocal agreement by <br />which an agreement needed to be worked out. He asked if there is another issue beyond <br />money that he is missing. He is tired of discussing this and would gladly let Chapel Hill run the <br />landfill for the time being. <br />Commissioner Carey said that he would like to keep the January 1, 2000 date, but if it <br />takes two or three months to work out these differences it should be clear that the transfer <br />would be six months from the signing of the proposed interlocal agreement. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he would like to send a message to Chapel Hill that the <br />Board of County Commissioners is in agreement on the first point with the addition of some <br />language with zoning restrictions and suggested that the last sentence be deleted. Regarding <br />the second point, he thinks Chapel Hill will agree to refer to the solid waste program as an <br />appendix. Regarding the third point, he would just say that the Greene Tract is referred to as a <br />landfill related asset. He feels there needs to be a deadline, and if these differences are not <br />resolved by September V t then the Board is content for Chapel Hill to retain operation of the <br />landfill. He thinks the Board needs to send back a fairly succinct message to Chapel Hill. If the <br />transfer of the land is made, he would like to change the name of the group from Landfill <br />Advisory Committee to Landfill Advisory Board. <br />Chair Gordon made reference to the first point and reiterated that the Board has no <br />intention of using the 60 acres for solid waste burial. <br />Commissioner Carey said that as long as this agreement does not prevent the County <br />from pursuing things that could be landfill uses that have not even been thought about yet, it is <br />fine. <br />Geoffrey Gledhill said that solid waste purposes probably will have to go through the <br />special use process and there are things that cannot be predicted about this process. He <br />suggested asking Chapel Hill and Carrboro along with the County to initiate a process to make <br />the kind of uses described as permitted uses with a site plan. This would eliminate the <br />contingency that it could not be used for any solid waste purposes. He said that putting <br />stipulations in the deed does not circumvent the process. <br />Chair Gordon said that the County has no intention of burying mixed solid waste on this <br />land, but she does not want to bind future boards. She said if future boards are bound, there <br />should be something left for them to do with the land. Regarding point three, she agrees that it