Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5l
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 06-07-2011
>
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5l
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2011 3:30:00 PM
Creation date
6/3/2011 3:29:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/7/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5l
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-07-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
RES-2011-059 Resolution Acknowledging Results from 2010 Census
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Attachment E ~ ~' ~ - a ~ (~ 1 d 5 <br />ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE RESULTS FROM THE 2010 CENSUS <br />INDICATING ORANGE COUNTY REMAINS IN LAWFUL COMPLIANCE WITH <br />APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' <br />NOMINATING DISTRICTS <br />WHEREAS, in 2005 and 2006 following a petition by Orange County residents to change the manner <br />of nominating Orange County Commissioners, Orange County began the process of creating nominating <br />districts for Orange County Commissioner elections; and <br />WHEREAS, in 2008 the first election was held in which the nominating districts were utilized; and <br />WHEREAS, North Carolina General Statute 153A-22 states in pertinent part that in a county where <br />commissioners are nominated or elected by district, the Board of Commissioners "may find as a fact <br />whether there is substantial inequality"; and <br />WHEREAS, State and Federal law require redistricting after each census when there is a finding of <br />such substantial inequality; and <br />WHEREAS, subsequent to the 2010 census Orange County staff examined the results of the census for <br />Orange County in its entirety and also for both nominating districts; and <br />WHEREAS, case law has established that where there is a ten percent (10%) discrepancy between the <br />smallest (by population) and largest districts that there then as a matter of law exists substantial <br />inequality and there must be a redistricting; and <br />WHEREAS, Orange County staff has determined the discrepancy between and among the <br />commissioner nominating districts of Orange County is within the ten percent (10%) legal threshold and <br />that as a matter of law there is no substantial inequality; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orange County Board of County Commissioners, <br />pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 153A-22, finds as a fact that there is no substantial inequality <br />between or among the commissioner nominating districts of Orange.. County. <br />This the 7~' day of June, 2011. <br />Bernadette Pelissier, Chair <br />Orange County Board of Commissioners <br />Attest: <br />18 <br />Donna Baker <br />Clerk to the Board of Commissioners <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.