Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C6
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 05-23-2011
>
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2011 4:47:15 PM
Creation date
5/23/2011 4:45:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.6
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-23-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachments g67 <br />~AN~ USA AND UNI~I~D DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) <br />AM€NDMENT OUTLINE <br /> <br />~a. ~~n~c~~~n~~~ ~o~t~ m v~~ious c~~~~o~e~s <br />1. Land Use and/or Zoning (Map and/or 1"ex~) <br />~.,~ hand Use Text <br />~.Fb hand Use ~iap ~l`~o~n, Tot <br />r <br />~..c ~oningText Office ln~tltutianal Oi fan ua a and ~tandardshan ~ <br />rLad ~V[ 1~~1-y FYI~Ap ~~i ~FiF F ~*" ! <br />~! UDO De~elapmen~ standards ~ <br />~~ UDO Develamen~Approval Processes <br />~.~ UDO Minor Text change _ ~ - _-- <br /> <br />~ Pur ose ~ss~an <br />To revie~u Piar~ning Director initiated amendments to certain sections afthe Unified <br />Development Ordinance related to the Office ~ Institutional {DID tuning district ar~d <br />other related sectians~ Specifically, the #allovuing sections of the Unified <br />Develapment Ordinance text are proposed for amendrnent: <br />~ Section .~4 ~ General omr~ercial Districts {Office ~ Inst~tutianal~ <br />~ Section ~~ ~ Table of Permitted Uses ~Ol District only} <br />~ Article ~.~ ~Definitions~-`Open space Ratio' and `RecreatianSpace Ratio' <br />~ol~owing adoption of the Unified Developrnent Ordinance ~uDO~ an April 5, ~o~.., <br />Planning staff began revie of existing regulations and their appiication to future <br />development praposalst It vas deterrnined that several of the standards applicable <br />to many of the current coning districts overlapped, and in some instances mere <br />onerous and limited development potential in districts intended for economic <br />deveiopment~ In addition, there aro inconsistencies in tern~inoiogy Within the UDO, <br />as Drell a betv~een the UDO and the ~~~ comprehensive Plan. `rho proposed <br />amendments to the UDO are intended to create more reasonable and effective <br />development standards far the Office~ir~stitutianal ~~ll~ caning district, as ~ve~l as fix <br />the inconsistencies inthe text. <br />~ ,~n~ a <br />As required under Section x.8.5 afthe Unified Develapment Ordina~~ce, the Planni~~g Director <br />is required to: 'case are ana~ys~s to be made of ~~e applr'ca~ron and, based ~~o~~ t~a~ ar~a~ys~s, <br />pre~a-+~r t~ recommenda~~ar~ for ca~srderat~orr ~y the Plaar~#t~ hoard ar~d ~~re Baar~d o~ Coarr~y <br />Wage ~ o <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.