Browse
Search
Minutes - 19990504
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Minutes - 19990504
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:20:47 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:40:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/4/1999
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-04-1999
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 3a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 3b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 3c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 3d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 3e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 6c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 6d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 6e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 7b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 7c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 7d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 7e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 05-04-1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a 1000-student school to a 1600-student facility. He presented a map of the site and explained the proposed <br />layout of the high school. He asked that the Board of County Commissioners approve the site. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to approve the <br />purchase of a 64.8 acre site on the north side of Grady Brown School Road in the amount of $603,200 for a <br />new high school in the Orange County School District as stated below: <br />ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COM <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE PRICE OF THE SITE <br />FOR <br />THE NEW HIGH SCHOOL IN THE ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOLS DISTRICT <br />WHEREAS, the bond referendum approved by Orange County voters in November 1997 included a portion <br />of the funding required for the construction of a new high school in the Orange County School district; and <br />WHEREAS, the Orange County schools have, since the approval of that bond referendum, engaged in a <br />process for identifying and selecting an appropriate site for that new high school, and have obtained options <br />for the purchase of an appropriate site; and <br />WHEREAS, North Carolina General Statutes-Section 116C-426 (f) provide that "...no contract for the <br />purchase of a site shall be executed nor any funds expended therefor without the approval of the board of <br />county commissioners as to the amount to be spent for the site..."; and <br />WHEREAS, representatives of the Orange County Board of Education have presented sufficient information <br />to persuade the Board of Commissioners that the proposed purchase price of $603,200 for the 64.8 acres <br />under consideration is an appropriate amount to be spent for the site; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Orange County Board of Commissioners that it hereby <br />approves the amount to be spent by the Orange County Board of Education for the site of the new high <br />school. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Commissioner Carey made reference to a letter, dated May 3rd from Randy Bridges regarding the <br />new elementary site on NC-67 and the School Board's willingness to move the site so that an opportunity can <br />be created for collocating a school and recreation facility for the northern part of the County. The letter states <br />that the Board of County Commissioners was not willing to share in the initial cost of site preparation. <br />Commissioner Carey said that he did not remember the Board taking official action not to share in the cost of <br />trying to make that site useful for schools and athletic purposes. The Board of County Commissioners have <br />been the biggest advocates for the collocation of recreational and school facilities and for value- engineering. <br />If the memo is correct, that it will cost more to the taxpayers of Orange County if the site preparation is <br />postponed, he was opposed to the delay. He asked for clarification on this issue. <br />County Manager John Link mentioned that staff had polled the Board of Commissioners to see if <br />they would be in favor of moving the elementary school site to create the possibility of adding ball fields in the <br />future, which is not connected to any kind of approval process for the development itself. As far as moving <br />the school site, and the associated costs that would be incurred, it was in excess of $100,000. One of the <br />favorable results, of course, would be the additional ball fields. There are not funds budgeted in the C.I.P. for <br />this expense, but more importantly the discussion that Craig Benedict had with the developer indicated that <br />they did expect some consideration on the part of the Commissioners for the donation of the eleven acres for <br />the ball fields. John Link said that he was clear, in his discussion with Ray DeBruhl, that there cannot be a <br />connectivity between the approval or acceptance of the acreage for ball fields being used in the open space <br />requirement for the development, prior to the approval of the development. This is the position that has been <br />clearly stated by the Board of Commissioners. <br />Q \19990504A.a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.