Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~~ v~ The site shall be designed ~~ fake advantage ~~ multiple shared use opporEuni~ies, v~rhich ray include a Park and Ride facility for pubiic~ranspor~a~ion. vi. ire Access: ~a} There shall be ~ rninin~um o~tvuo access points ~~ the site, ~~} access points shall separate student drop»o~ areas and visitor parl~in from bus traffic. {c} l~ schoo! buses are used, then at least one access shall !~~ limited ~o school err~ployee and bus use during norms! schoo! hours. ~d} ~!! access points steal! be located ~o provide rnaxin~um visibility and a~e~yi fie} o driveway shall b permitted in a location ghat aril! hinder or congest ~raic rnoven~ent on a pubiic s~ree~, ~ ~~: The applicant is shoving the required access points ~o the properly o o~ Old ~l ~ 0, ln~ernai circulation segregates student drop-olpick-up traffic ~ron~ visitor or staff traffic. ~ there is no proposed use o~ schooC buses, the applicant i nod required ~o provide a separate access point for school employee and bus use, ~ro,c,eei,ngs: In accordance pith the provisions o~ section ~.7s~ o~ the UDO, a glass A special Use Permit is processed through a quasi judicial revievu process ~rhere the BOCK and Planning Poard hear factual evidence and svuorn testimony concerning the project's compliance pith the requirements o~ the Ordinance. In rendering a derision on the application, the ~O bases its findings o~ fact on the evidence entered into the record during the public hearing process. Please re~er~o~~tachmen~ 5 for a synopsis of the quasi~~udicial revie~r process Anal sis~ As required under section ,~.4 of the UDO€ the Planning Director is required to. `cause ~ a~yi ~o be aa~e o~ ~~e appfic~ion' and pass that analysis on to the reviein body In analyzing fihis request, the Planning Director offers the folloing. ~~ The application has been deemed compiete in accordance v~i~h the requirements of Section ~.7 and section .~.~ of the UDO. . Staff has determined that a school is a cus~on~ry accessory use for a church and, as a result, has allov~ed the applican~~o move~orvard uvith this application. Existing regulations do not ~al~e info consideration the location o~ a school, public or private, vi~hin an existing t'acility on a previously developed parcelt ~xi~ing standards also do nod tape into consideration that the `schoo!' ~uvuld be the secondary ~i.e. accessory} use of a parce! of properly. The standards of revieuv are the same as i~ the applicant vere proposing the development ova parcel of prope~y to support a neu~ school facility. 4. Staff has de~errnined that the propey is o~ sufficient sire to support the proposed ~~ students, . The proposal alloys for a use o~ property consis~entuvith the Don~prehensive Plan's sand Use de'rna~ion ~i.e. ~ g~yer Transition}, The proposal appears consistent pith the various goals outlined v~i~hin the comprehensive Dian concerning de~relopment, including: