Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~~ The applicant utiriii be required fo adhere fo any permitting conditions imposed by ~l~~oT. The UDC requires f hat the property have access from an existing public road and that such access be in compliance pith any and all public read access management plan adopted by grange bounty. ~r~~ A previously indicated, old N ~ 0 is a state Maintained Road classified a a Major Arterial by grange ounfy~ The applicant is proposing ~o have vehicular ingress and egress From old N ~ ~ ~a access the property '~1. o~~i~r~a~ any; der section ~..4 ~a} ~} fin} of the ~D the ~ollov~in additional standards are required as part of the SUS revie~r~ i, for non-charter public schools, the minimum lot sire shall be as required by f he school Construction standards adopted from time to time b the hoard ~~ ounfy Commissioners, the grange bounty board of ducafion and the Chapel Hill~arrboro board of ~d ucation. ii, I~or all schooEs, the lot sire shall be adequate to accor~n~odafe alE activities, The proposed methods fo handle fihe rnaximun~ nun~hero~participants and patrons for any single event shall be provided chile also adhering to safe vehicular and pedestrian circulation, rya tai believes the lot is of sufficient sire to accor~modate the proposed project. The applicant is not proposing outdoor activities that ~rould normally generate high traffic volumes {i.e. sports events} and the proposed ~na~imum cap o~ ~ pupils gill reduce access dennand to the property. iii- Negative visual innpacts shall be ~ninirni~ed along any major roadvuay, NegatEve visual irnpacfs include, but are not lirnified to} IoadinglunEoading areas, delivery areas, air handling unify proof fop and other}, parking areas for machinery and storage buildingsi Appropriate screening methods shall be used to enhance the aesthetic value of a project ~ ~r~r~~~ As the proposal does not call for the clearing of existing vegetation, staff is satisfied thatthe applicant can adhere to Phis requirement. iv. Transportation improvements as deemed necessary by the Traffic Impact Analysis. ~~~f r~~: As previously indicated a formal Traffic impact Analysis is not required forthis project staff has required the applicant to submit the life plan to the NC~T for revie. NCD~T is in the process of rvleu~in and issuing a drivev~ay permit That gill identify any and all on~off~site improvements necessary to address trafficflo~v concerns. The applicant v~ill be required to adhere to any permitting conditions imposed by NCI~~T,