Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Committee AC no major concerns were expressed by other County agencies with respect to their review. As a result, planning staff members have completed a Finding of No Significant Impact FO11SI memo (See Attachment 6). The FONSI is referenced in the Special Use Permit Findings of Fact. The Biological Inventory (see Attachment 1 ) Indicates that there are no substantial negative environmental impacts associated with this development. All sensitive areas are either undisturbed or protected with stream buffers or landscaped buffers. Two small, regulated wetland areas were delineated. Both sites are either in proposed dedicated open space or landscaped buffer areas. conditional ' Use cU process: The CU process, which took the place of the Planned Development II process as contained within the former Zoning Ordinance, involves the approval of a rezoning petition and a class A Special Use permit to allow for the development of a specific land use on a parcel of property. The process requires the approval of a site plan by the BOCC. It should be remembered that while this project 'is being processed under the CU review standards as contained within the U o, there are submittal l requirements that this application are not required to adhere to given the wording of Section 1.1.14 (C) of the UD .lost notably, the applicant is not required to submit a formal `transportation Improvement Study as part of the application. While the applicant has indicated they will submit traffic details at the public hearing, ar formal study was not required as part of thi process. The CU process requires a twb-step approval process, specifically: 1. A rezoning approval i.e. legislative process) in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8 of the UDO and 2. A class A Special Use Permit (SUFI) approval i.e. quasi - judicial process) in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.7 and 2. 9 of the UDO. These review processes follow existing guidelines associated with the processing of such requests. Please refer to Attachment 7 for a copy of the flow charts contained within the U o detailing the review /approval process for a rezoning and a SUP application. The review of each application component i.e. part of the overall project review although the different in terns of their scope and requirements. The normal cadence of review is as follows: rezoning and SUP) occurs simultaneously as requirements of each component are vastly CU applications are reviewed during one of the four joint Quarterly Public Hearings held by the Planning Board and the cc; o All individuals intending to offer com ent estimony on the application shall be sworn by the Clerk, to the BOGG includin q County staff, prior to spearing; � • K r r f Q �� , I : p a— lfi (j for and �; °�: � I � .� �k -)r j :;$ � will � �-r:��i� �: * �= �� G, V1 � (I. � -'w � ;� �� :��:�� :�� �. 0ii the ;iii lldity of �Iie The ite ri : ),,,, 1 b ib rwa rd to the PI R(-)(3 rd fo r a re co m rn i n; x