Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-19-2011
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 05-19-2011
>
Agenda - 05-19-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2017 1:52:57 PM
Creation date
5/23/2011 3:13:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/19/2011
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-19-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> KEY POINTS: <br /> 1. Ridership numbers indicate that the Gateway station serves as an important boarding station <br /> for Orange County residents destined for Duke University and other Durham locations, while <br /> the Leigh Village station serves as an important boarding station for trips destined to UNC- <br /> Chapel Hill. <br /> 2. All of these segments (and likely many others) clearly benefit both counties, with the mutual <br /> benefit most pronounced on the Leigh Village—Hillmont segment, where 46%of trip ends <br /> are associated with Orange County locations, 43%are associated with Durham County <br /> locations and 11%are associated with Chatham and Wake County locations. <br /> IMPORTANT CAVEATS: <br /> 1. Ridership is for the Year 2035 and comes from the Regional Transportation Model version being <br /> used by Triangle Transit for the alternatives analysis process, known as Version 4e2. It is a <br /> modified version of the model used to develop the 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan, and <br /> differs from version 5 which will be used for the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. All <br /> modeling results, especially those for small segments of the transportation system, should be <br /> viewed as approximations. <br /> 2. The land use analysis of the on-going NC 54 Study suggests that more development can occur in <br /> the area examined in this analysis than is in Version 4e2 of the model. If so, it might influence the <br /> distribution of trip ends. <br /> 3. Significant future changes to parking costs and constraints at UNC-Chapel Hill compared to those <br /> assumed in the transportation model could affect ridership forecasts. More constrained parking <br /> at Duke University could also influence mode choices for residents in the study area who travel to <br /> Duke. <br /> 4. In considering benefits (including ridership) and the other components of transit investments: <br /> bus-hours of service, revenues and costs, metrics can be viewed in several ways, including in <br /> aggregate or on a per-capita basis. Currently, Durham County has almost exactly double the <br /> population of Orange County(267,587 vs. 133,801 according to the 2010 Census). According to <br /> the state demographer, by 2030 Orange County is projected to have 42% of the population of <br /> Durham County. <br /> Page 1 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.