Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-19-2011
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 05-19-2011
>
Agenda - 05-19-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2017 1:52:57 PM
Creation date
5/23/2011 3:13:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/19/2011
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-19-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 1 3 <br /> Shared Benefits <br /> Examining Light Rail Transit Investments Near the Durham-Orange County Line <br /> May 9, 2011 <br /> Goal <br /> Provide elected officials with objective information about Light Rail Transit (LRT) investment <br /> benefits and costs to inform discussions on how to pay for both bus and rail investments with <br /> any locally-controlled sales tax and vehicle fee revenues. <br /> Sew <br /> The planned Light Rail Transit investment would closely parallel the Durham-Orange County line <br /> as it approaches Chapel hill's Gateway station from the east near 1-40 and US 15-501 until it <br /> heads west-ward toward UIVC-Chapel Hill from the Friday Center station along NC54. Half-mile <br /> "walk access zones" at the Gateway Station, Meadowmont or Hillmont Stations (which lie along <br /> alternative alignments) and the Friday Center would all be partly in both counties. <br /> Discussion Framework <br /> A Light Rail Transit (LRT) or Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) investment along the 17-mile corridor in the <br /> Triangle Transit Alternatives Analysis would provide benefits to citizens and enterprises in both <br /> Durham and Orange Counties, especially since the most intense and transit-supportive activities <br /> are located at both ends of the line: UNC-Chapel Hill on the west and Downtown Durham and <br /> Duke University on the east. These benefits are expected to overlap most significantly in the <br /> "area of greatest mutual benefit" along the Durham-Orange County line described above. <br /> Discussions among decision-makers about the investments have centered around three <br /> elements: the different types of new revenues that might be available and their sources by <br /> location; the costs of the investment, and how these costs relate to the amount of bus service <br /> that could be provided in each county, and the benefits of the investments, and the degree to <br /> which these benefits can be attributed to citizens and enterprises in each county. <br /> New Revenues <br /> Revenues for an LRT or BRT investment could come from several new revenue sources (in <br /> addition to the existing Triangle Transit rental car tax, which will also supply funding): <br /> 1. Federal "new starts" $: 45 or 50%federal share assumed; federal $ required in finance model <br /> 2. State "intermodal bill" $: 25%state share assumed; state$ required in finance model <br /> 3. Local % cent sales tax: included in finance model <br /> 4. Local $7 vehicle fee increase: included in finance model <br /> 5. Triangle Transit$3 increase in vehicle fee: included in finance model <br /> 6. Local government value capture: potential source; not currently in finance model <br /> 7. Institutional contributions: potential source; not currently in finance model <br /> 8. Parking deck or lot charges: potential source; not currently in finance model <br /> 9. Rider fares: included in finance model <br /> Page 1 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.