Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-17-2011- 8a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 05-17-2011
>
Agenda - 05-17-2011- 8a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2012 12:35:10 PM
Creation date
5/13/2011 3:16:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/17/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-17-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E <br />3. There may be alternative disposal methods available for solid waste management at <br />some future date. Regardless of technology, those alternative methods will come at a <br />higher cost AND still involve the transport of large volumes of waste to a specific location. <br />This will remain a county -wide issue BUT not solely a county government problem. <br />Legitimate, forthright discussions need to occur involving the disposal of municipal solid <br />waste. Method to be selected, how to fund the associated costs and where to place <br />facilities remain to be properly addressed. The process should be transparent but <br />focused. NO neighborhood, urban or rural, wants to host such a facility. Addressing <br />those localized concerns will be a difficult and troubling task. <br />4. Recycling remains a high priority in Orange County. The County has taken the lead role <br />in providing these services county -wide. The County must continue to focus on <br />efficiencies in both the fixed drop -off locations and curbside service elements of this <br />program. Automation and compaction of recyclables will help contain costs BUT those <br />costs will increase. <br />Recycling also includes debris and yard waste services along with demolition waste <br />disposal. Those residing in the Rogers /Eubanks Road area should recognize and <br />understand that Eubanks Road will remain home to the County's demolition debris <br />disposal efforts and solid waste equipment storage and maintenance functions long after <br />the municipal solid waste landfill closure. <br />There are no current plans to relocate that facility or site a new similar facility elsewhere <br />in Orange County for the foreseeable future. <br />5. Summarizing: Extending the lifespan current municipal solid waste landfill can provide a <br />revenue stream to address some but not all Rogers Road area needs. Determining what <br />needs are addressed is a role for community /government collaboration but the final <br />decision and responsibility for action rests with the Board of Commissioners in <br />conjunction with municipal cooperation. Moving forward will bring some closure to many <br />long standing issues (besides just the landfill). It will not resolve or address all <br />community concerns or desired outcomes. Those goals will require on -going efforts and <br />commitments among all of those with a vested interest in Orange County's future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.