Browse
Search
Minutes - 19990407
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Minutes - 19990407
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:24:43 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:40:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/7/1999
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-07-1999
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 04-07-1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Conner requested that the public ask questions of the panel members, rather than <br />state concerns or opinions. <br />Pete McDowell from Orange County asked if, in the opinion of the scientists, the <br />evaluation of a tornado or hurricane has been addressed in the application. <br />Mr. Lochbaum said that the weak link in the emergency generators is that they need air <br />to work. In generators, the system blocks air from going through because of the pressure during a storm. <br />There have been some problems at some other plants. He has not looked at Harris specifically. <br />Dr. Thompson said that CP&L has addressed reactor accidents but not pool accidents, <br />during a tornado or other disaster. <br />Sandra Marlo from Chapel Hill read a statement and said that she hopes that CP&L <br />would publish their emergency map in case of an accident. She asked who is liable in case of an <br />emergency or an accident. She asked if CP&L pays if homes, or land, or life is lost. She asked what <br />rights we have in the liability of an accident. <br />Steven Carr said that CP&L would be liable for whatever damages they cause from an <br />accident. There is insurance carried by CP&L that is required by the federal government. <br />Glenn Jones from Apex asked if the CP&L plant is terrorist proof. <br />Steven Carr said that they have a high security system that would protect the facility. <br />Mr. Lochbaum said that the NRC used to do security inspections. However, they got <br />over the fence undetected 6 out of 10 times and they canceled the inspections for awhile, but have now <br />continued them. He feels security is an issue. <br />Dr. Gordon Thompson talked of two incidences of security breach. <br />G.R. Quinn from Sanford asked how many people have died from this type of storage <br />facility. <br />Mr. Lochbaum said none. <br />Mr. Quinn also asked about the area that would be contaminated, if it would be unlivable. <br />Dr. Thompson said that you could live in an area for about thirty years after an accident, <br />but there would be an increase in cancer rates of about 7-8%. <br />Mr. Quinn said that this was bogus information, because Hiroshima had 200,000 people <br />there, and now there is over one million people living there. He thinks Orange County is wasting their <br />money. <br />Sally Walker from Chapel Hill asked if there may be a statement from CP&L. She would <br />like to hear both sides of the issue. <br />Steven Carr from CP&L said that their reason for being here is to listen to the comments, <br />questions, and concerns about the CP&L plan. They have invited elected officials to tour the plant and <br />attend the open house. They are on a path at this time where Orange County has filed an intervention to <br />their application. They are trying to understand the concerns. Basically, there is a lawsuit. As part of <br />NRC's review process, Orange County has filed its contentions and CP&L will, in the next few weeks, be <br />filing a response. These are complex and very technical issues. They want their responses to answer <br />the concerns about their plan. He said that Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) knows their plan is a safe <br />plan and they remain confident that the NRC will agree with them. The big question is whether it is a safe <br />and responsible plan. They believe that it is, and are confident that it is. They are using the same proven <br />technology that they have used for the last ten years. He said they would not propose it if it were not <br />safe. <br />Moderator Conner gave each panel member an opportunity to make a short statement. <br />Jim Warren said that they learned of this proposal last summer and are very concerned <br />about the NRC process, and do not believe that the NRC represents the public. They had hoped that <br />CP&L would address all the technical concerns that were raised in an open process, but they did not. <br />Now, CP&L has decided not to open the process. He feels that the probability for an accident increases <br />each year if the fuel is not off-loaded. He said he does not have all the answers, but he has listened to <br />the experts, and he has listened to CP&L's side, and has read their application. He thinks there is a <br />common sense connection. NC WARN believes that the very small additional cost to CP&L to go to a <br />safer plan should be reconsidered. NC WARN estimates the additional cost to CP&L to be $31 million <br />dollars spread over 15 years, based on numbers from their application. That is a small amount of money <br />for this big corporation. They had a net gain of $339 million last year alone. NC Warren believes it would <br />be foolish for Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) to avoid and deny the cautions of two of the top nuclear
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.