Browse
Search
Minutes - 19990331
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Minutes - 19990331
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:26:44 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:40:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/31/1999
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-31-1999
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 1a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 1b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 1c-1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 1c-S
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 2a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 2b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 3b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 3d1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 3d-2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 3g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-31-1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOLS <br />Superintendent Randy Bridges stated that the Orange County School System is facing all of the same issues. <br />They are also facing the challenge of how to recruit and retain quality staff and are committed to increasing the <br />local supplement. They are addressing a need for early intervention with the pre-K population. At the present time <br />the Orange County School system does not have either a Head Start or a Pre-K program. They are interested in <br />including both of these programs in the curriculum. A survey was distributed to parents last year in which they <br />indicated a strong desire for a foreign language in the K-5 program. After the opening of this next school the <br />School Board will begin to look at decreasing the number of students per class. <br />DISCUSSION AND COMMENTS ON ORANGE COUNTY AND CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO <br />SUPERINTENDENT'S PRESENTATIONS: <br />Neil Pedersen pointed out that they have a very ambitious ten-year program. This past February they reviewed <br />that plan again and are considering further reduction in their projected class size. It is difficult to make progress in <br />class size reduction while at the same time the school district continues to grow and new schools are opened. <br />They will revisit this issue again with the School Board this year. <br />Chair Gordon asked the Superintendents to create a chart by grade showing the state standards for enrollment, <br />what enrollment is for each grade and what the target is for each grade. Also, a breakdown of teacher <br />supplements based on years of experience would be helpful. <br />Commissioner Carey referred to the Low English Proficiency (LEP) report which indicated that there were 8 <br />teachers in that program several years ago. He asked how many there are now? Superintendent Pedersen stated <br />that there are eight now. The LEP Task Force recommended adding an additional 4 teachers to that program. <br />They are not sure that they will be able to fulfill this request but they are committed to making progress. <br />Roger Waldon mentioned that the LEP report stated that a good student/teacher ratio for English as a Second <br />Language (ESL) is 20/1 and the ratio for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro System is currently at 40/1. Also, the number of <br />students being served in this program is growing at a rate of 10% to 20% each year. <br />Neil Pedersen indicated that they continue to locate students who are not being served who could benefit from this <br />program and for that reason they do not expect to make significant progress in decreasing the student/teacher <br />ratio. <br />SCHOOLS & LAND USE COUNCILS MEETING: John Link reported that these Councils have been meeting for <br />approximately two years. Three specific products have arisen from the work of these Councils. The first is a <br />process by which the Managers and Superintendents inform each other when a certain threshold of new housing <br />units has been reached. When 30 units have been approved a memo is drafted from the appropriate Manager to <br />the Superintendent. When 60 units have been approved, a written information message to the School Board is <br />drafted. Finally, when 100 units have been approved, a meeting is called of the members of the Councils to <br />discuss the impact. The Councils recently received verbal reports from each jurisdictions about current <br />development and its impact. The Councils have produced a Memorandum of Agreement which provides <br />coordinated site and facility planning. Members of the Councils are currently engaged in a final review of this <br />document. When they are finished with their review, the Memorandum of Agreement will be forwarded to each <br />jurisdiction for review and adoption. The Memorandum of Agreement is designed to facilitate collocation and <br />efficiency. The joint Councils have been considering the issue of a coordinated, managed development process for <br />the entire County. Council member McClintock's summary of the March 10th meeting presents a review of the <br />report given by County Attorney Gledhill and County Planning Director Benedict. A copy of this memorandum is in <br />the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office. <br />Geof Gledhill stated that agreement among the local elected bodies is the first step toward creating a concurrency <br />plan. This includes the towns, county and the school boards. The Agreement would contain an adequate public <br />facilities plan for each school system which would be reviewed and agreed upon by the County. This would require <br />an interlocal agreement. After the facilities plan is approved, a funding plan would be developed. The planning <br />jurisdictions could then enact an ordinance which would say that when residential development is proposed it <br />would not be approved if it would cause the schools in that jurisdiction to be over capacity. Part of the process <br />would involve the developer going to the school system so that they could advise them about the potential impact <br />of their development. They would then talk about the projected enrollment and a decision would be made by the <br />schools on whether the facilities plan that is in place would meet the demand created by the proposed <br />development. If the demand could be met, then the school system would issue a certificate that would be taken by <br />Q:\19990331 a.doc I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.