Minutes - 19990222 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Planner Lincoln stated that the submitted traffic impact analysis was originally one pamphlet with several additional items included later. Orange County staff asked for a revised traffic impact analysis that would have everything in one pamphlet so that it could be distributed. There is nothing outstanding from the State Department of Transportation (DOT). Regarding the last letter received from the District Engineer, the issues that DOT would be concerned about would have to be resolved before DOT would approve any of the improvements for the subdivision. Geof Gledhill asked if all of the data the applicant wants to have entered as evidence has been entered into the record. Karen indicated that it has been entered. Commissioner Halkiotis asked Transportation Planner Slade McCalip to comment on what is meant by "peak hours" for Hwy 70 with regard to the state's definition of the word "capacity." What actually is the capacity? He mentioned that he rides both Hwy 70 Business and Bypass and he has noticed a significant increase in the volume of through traffic in the last several years. Planner McCalip indicated that Level Service "E" is capacity and "F is over capacity. When a road is over capacity, any minor disruption causes slowdowns and backups. In response to a question from Commissioner Halkiotis to further explain what the letter definitions really mean, Mr. McCalip indicated that, in his opinion, this road is currently over capacity at certain times of the day. Commissioner Brown asked the developer for clarification regarding size and price. He repeated that there are examples of houses of similar size and price in both the Woodcroft and Downing Creek subdivisions. Planning Board member Katz asked for clarification regarding the impact that the Scottswood development would have on the traffic patterns. He wanted to know if there is an accurate assessment of what the consequence of this development's impact will be on traffic with the addition of previously approved housing in that area. Planner McCalip referred to Page 157 of the packet which presented projected traffic volumes. He stated that US 70 Bypass is currently experiencing more trips and it is forecast in the regional model to get much more traffic in the next 20 years. Commissioner Halkiotis mentioned that there are signs on Interstate 1-40 which refer to trucks using Hwy 70 Business. He asked why that was happening. He has seen tractor trailers doing U-turns at 7:45 in the morning on Hwy 70. He said that he was alarmed to hear that it was projected to get worse. Planner McCalip indicated that Hillsborough has a prohibition on trucks using Churton Street which explains why these trucks are using Hwy 70 in that way. Also, he mentioned that the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Work Group, of which Orange County is a member, has forecast that US 70 will have a significant increase in traffic. It will be well over capacity by 2025. He explained that the Transportation Improvement Plan includes planned improvements for Hwy 70 but those improvements are not yet programmed. He explained that improvements are not actually expected to be completed until they are included in the State Transportation Program. Only improvements that are programmed are intended to be completed within the next six years. Proposed improvements go into the plan and from there they are selected to be included in the program to be completed within a six-year time period. It could be included sometime after the year 2006. A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Carey, to Q:119990221d.c