Minutes - 19990222 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

should be approved before the school system has proper plans and funding in place to serve the educational needs of additional students. The Sheriff's Department was properly questioned as to their capabilities and possible expansion due to the new subdivision. He asked why the school system was not similarly questioned. His basic concern has to do with the lack of facilities to serve the children in this subdivision. Also, the secondary issue for him is the lack of sidewalks and bike paths. Mr. George Krichbaum was asked if he wanted to speak and he commented that he did not intend to speak unless he could provide answers to specific questions. Suzette Andrews came forward and was sworn in by Deputy Clerk Kathy Baker. ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD S.A.M. Brooks commented that there are some things that are beyond the purview of the Planning Board as well as the County Commissioners. One of these is the ramification of the school issue. If you had 87 individual lots in different areas of Orange County, and if they were single family homes where you would expect them to have children, would you also say those individual homes should be denied? Elizabeth Walters asked staff what size home it takes in Orange County to pay for itself in terms of County services. Planner Lincoln stated that she could not specifically answer the question asked by Ms. Walters. However, in the past, a development model was created which showed the intensity of development, which would require specific public services. That model indicated that if this project is built as proposed and if it started in 1999, that by 2002 the County would be spending more for public services than the development would generate in taxes. Elizabeth Walters asked for this information to be provided to the Planning Board at their next meeting. Suzette Andrews stated that she is a lifelong resident of Orange County and that there have been transportation issues and overcrowding in the schools as long as she can remember. She asked what was the exceptional factor about this subdivision that makes it different from other recently approved subdivisions. It does not create problems with the schools or traffic flow. She has reviewed the development plans and it seems that they have complied with what was expected. The Comprehensive Plan was written by the county and it has been adhered to by this developer. She asked if the Comprehensive Plan and transition areas are going to be changed or are we going to move forward with the development. She stated that she is very involved in real estate sales in the area. Everyday she encounters people who are trying to purchase a home and who are trapped in a rental market. In her opinion, the biggest factor that this developer is dealing with is that he is coming forth with an affordable housing community. She has seen $200,000 housing communities approved and this concerns her. The fabric of our community is made up of teachers, law enforcement officers, and young people and they cannot start in the $150,000+ price range. She asked the Board of Commissioners to consider that there is either a move up or a move down market, or there is no market. When we think about housing and values, we need to realize that if we all live in the same type of houses, eventually we will reach a point where there are no buyers or sellers. Chair Gordon asked if since the answers to the traffic impact questions had not been received from the Department of Transportation, does it make sense to hold the rezoning part of the hearing open or should it be closed. Q:119990221d.c