Browse
Search
Minutes - 19990222
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Minutes - 19990222
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:32:46 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:39:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/22/1999
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-22-1999
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-22-1999
Agenda - 02-22-1999 - 1a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-22-1999
Agenda - 02-22-1999 - 1c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-22-1999
Agenda - 02-22-1999 - d1b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-22-1999
Agenda - 02-22-1999 - d2a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-22-1999
Agenda - 02-22-1999 - d2b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-22-1999
Agenda - 02-22-1999 - handout
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-22-1999
Agenda - 02-22-1999 - Sign Up Sheets
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-22-1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rest with the Planning Board if the development is approved and there are no facilities to provide for <br />bicycles, skate boards, in-line skating, and so forth. He was also concerned about the adequacy of <br />the schools to handle this new development. Ms. Barrows requested that he communicate this <br />concern to the school system. He wrote, as result of that request, to Ms. Susan Dovenbarger of the <br />school board asking her several questions about the adequacy of the schools to handle the increased <br />number of children who would be coming from this development. Ms. Dovenbarger gave his letter to <br />Superintendent Randy Bridges so that he could answer his specific questions. Mr. Hendrickson then <br />reviewed each of his questions and the answers. <br />1) What elementary and middle schools will serve this subdivision? The answer to that question was <br />Cameron Park Elementary and C.W. Stanford Middle School. <br />2) Assuming that one half of the anticipated number of the children from Lawrence Park will be in <br />elementary school, will the designated schools be able to absorb this number? The answer was that <br />Cameron Park is approximately 25 students under capacity this year. Last year the school was over <br />capacity the entire year. According to Superintendent Bridges, the probable number of additional <br />students who would be generated by Lawrence Park subdivision would bring the capacity to an <br />impossible level. They would have to add mobile units to an already landlocked campus. <br />Superintendent Bridges said that the quality of academic progress would be as big an issue as the <br />space for teachers. The State would provide additional teachers if more students enter the system <br />but there is no place to put them because Cameron Park has no place to put mobile units. He further <br />stated that there are plans for the high school population to grow but there are no plans for a new <br />middle school. A.L. Stanback and C.W. Stanford are at capacity. With the addition of this new <br />subdivision as well as others that are in the planning stages, Orange County would need a new <br />middle school in the next five years. <br />3) Would the designated middle school and Orange High School adequately serve the older children? <br />Superintendent Bridge's answer was "no." He said that both the middle school and high school are at <br />or above capacity. <br />4) What will be the actual cost to the school system to provide class instruction, adequate facilities, <br />extracurricular services, transportation and other prescribed services of public education to these <br />children? Superintendent Bridges answered that it was almost impossible to place a dollar amount on <br />these services. Orange County currently allocates teachers at a ratio of 1 per 22 students at the <br />elementary level and 1 per 25 students at the secondary level. These levels are less than the state <br />allocations because this is what Orange County feels is in the best interest of its students. Local <br />dollars are used to provide additional instruction. The state will provide additional teachers using the <br />higher formula. Orange County would have to generate additional dollars to maintain its current level <br />and would need more teachers. Schools cannot be built as quickly as these subdivisions are built. <br />We would then have to lease or purchase mobile units. Leasing them could cost $7,000 per year. It <br />would cost more than $30,000 for purchase and set up these mobile classrooms. The school <br />receives approximately $2,020 per student from the County as local funds for the students. That <br />amount, plus what we get from the state, gives our system approximately $5,000 per student. When <br />you look at supplies, equipment, extracurricular activities and other services, that amount is not nearly <br />enough. Mr. Bridges then spoke of transportation and the fact that Orange County has an efficient <br />transportation system. However, to serve additional students, new buses would be needed and the <br />state is very slow in providing funds to increase school bus service. The Superintendent further <br />stated that even if the developer donates the land for a new school facility, the school system does <br />not have the money to build the school. It costs between $10 and $15 million dollars to build a school <br />and that money needs to be generated on the backs of the taxpayers of Orange County. <br />5) The last question was would the Board of Education request or demand compensation from the <br />developer to provide for required new services or would they expect normal tax increases from <br />Orange County taxpayers to support new growth. There was no answer from the Superintendent <br />because that question would have to be answered by the School Board. <br />Mr. Hendrickson said that neither Lawrence Park, nor any other planned subdivision, <br />Q:119990221d.c
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.