Orange County NC Website
regarding the Environmental Impact Assessment for Lawrence Park. The North Carolina Wildlife <br />Resources Commission has indicated a Finding of "No Significant Impact" provided four concerns <br />were addressed. Those concerns involved erosion control, stormwater management, minimum 25' <br />riparian buffer along small streams or wetlands and coordinating unavoidable impacts to any wetlands <br />or streams with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Orange County EMS estimates that the county <br />will have to hire one full time position to serve the proposed development. The Orange County board <br />of Education stated that when the proposed subdivision is developed, children in the subdivision <br />would be assigned to Cameron Park Elementary School and C. W. Stanford Middle School. Both of <br />those schools are at, or over capacity, with little room for expansion. Included in the agenda packet <br />was a copy of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in February <br />1998, and a follow-up letter regarding an addendum to the Traffic Impact Study, dated June 23, 1998. <br />On February 5, 1999, staff forwarded to the John R. MCAdams Company the portion of the draft <br />minutes from the November 23, 1998 public hearing outlining the requests for more information. No <br />information was received in the Planning Department in response to those requests. <br />Chair Gordon asked about the legality of holding the hearing open in order to receive <br />certain information from the applicant which has been requested but not yet received. <br />Planner Lincoln indicated that evidence must be presented at the public hearing and the <br />presenter must be available for cross-examination. <br />QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: None <br />QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD: <br />Planning Board Chair Barrows referred to the letters from DOT District Engineer Tommy <br />Dyer dated August 8, 1998 and November 18, 1998. She asked if he had an opportunity to look at <br />the study that the applicant submitted. <br />Ms. Lincoln indicated that Mr. Dyer had not communicated with the Planning Department <br />since the November 18, 1998 letter. She indicated that Mr. Dyer agreed with most of what the <br />applicant had proposed with several minor exceptions. One of the issues was that DOT does not <br />maintain bus shelters. The developer said that they would provide bus shelters but they would not be <br />responsible for maintaining them. <br />PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT: Roger Perry, a partner with East West Partners <br />Management Company and a co-applicant with the owner of the property, asked that the applications <br />be considered from two perspectives. First, he asked if the Board of County Commissioners believed <br />in the Comprehensive Plan. He commented that this project is a mirror image of what is described for <br />this area in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this as a transition area <br />appropriate for development of smaller, single family homes upon the availability of public sanitary <br />sewer and water. The developers intend to bring sanitary sewer and water to this site. The Zoning <br />Ordinance defines transition land as land located in areas that are in the process of changing from <br />rural to urban, and are suitable for urban-type densities including the provision of public utilities and <br />services within the second ten year phase of the plan. The Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1981 <br />so we are 17 112 years into the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. What is being proposed <br />for this development is very consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Secondly, he asked the <br />Commissioners to make a decision about how they believe the County should grow, and whether or <br />not it is better to put more people on less land or less people on more land. He stated that putting <br />less people on more land has been the growth and development pattern in Orange County. There <br />has been a very strong effort by this Board of County Commissioners to establish and protect rural <br />buffers throughout the County. What we have had in Orange County is a patchwork development of <br />Q:119990221d.c