Browse
Search
Minutes - 19990218
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Minutes - 19990218
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:33:12 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:39:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/18/1999
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-18-1999
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 10
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 6
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 7
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 8
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 9
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 02-18-1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
clarification and agreement on planning future operations. The scope of the MRF needs to be specified as <br />well as financing future efforts. John Link mentioned that there are committees working on some of the solid <br />waste issues including a MRF, a C&D site, financing future projects, etc. The County Commissioners <br />decided that these committees should continue with these goals and bring forth their recommendations. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he feels the County needs an agreement between all the jurisdictions <br />on how the County is going to operate solid waste management after the County takes over responsibility. <br />By consensus the County Commissioners agreed that the decision has been made for the County to <br />takeover solid waste management. Chair Gordon added that she agrees with the County taking over solid <br />waste management but only under certain conditions. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that there is confusion from the Chapel Hill and Carrboro representatives <br />on the LOG. He feels they should proceed on the MRF proposal because the LOG is paying consultants <br />$100,000 to develop a plan for this facility to fit Orange County needs. <br />The County Commissioners discussed the date they would take over solid waste management <br />operations and decided that they would take over six months after the interlocal agreement is approved by all <br />jurisdictions involved. <br />Commissioner Brown said that she does not feel that taking over solid waste management is that <br />complicated. She said that the interlocal agreement needs to be finalized and the financing should be in <br />place. Regarding the MRF, she suggested that the County start with a small facility which can be expanded. <br />This would be a County decision. <br />Commissioner Brown made reference to the interlocal agreement and said that it needs to be specific <br />about the Greene Tract. She feels the County Commissioners need to make a decision for what is done with <br />the Greene Tract. She has an offer from Carole Crumley's class to do an inventory, both cultural and <br />environmental, of this tract. She noted that the deed specifies that the property can only be used for a public <br />purpose. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he feels as soon as the County adopts the 1999-2000 operation budget <br />for the landfill that the LOG should be dissolved. Until that time, the LOG could continue with their work but <br />make no commitment of funds. All future decisions would be made by the County Commissioners. <br />Rod Visser said that the landfill operation will continue no matter when the County takes over <br />management responsibilities. There is a lot of work to be done with reclassifying employees and transferring <br />the employees from Chapel Hill to the County staff. <br />Chair Gordon said that she does not believe the County has adequate staff in place for this transition. <br />The County has Y2K issues to address and the budget process will be starting soon. The Board asked the <br />County Manager to do an agenda abstract outlining the staff he needs before the County can assume solid <br />waste management operations. <br />Commissioner Carey agreed that the County needs to go ahead and try to finish the interlocal <br />agreement by April 1 and if the County needs additional staff, they need to put the personnel in place so the <br />LOG can be dissolved by June 30. The advisory committee would be put in place at that time. <br />John Link made reference to the MRF and pointed out that assuming responsibility for solid waste <br />management assumes that the County will finance a MRF facility. The County would not be able to impose <br />upon the towns to pay for this facility unless paying for it is part of the interlocal agreement. The only <br />financing alternatives the County Commissioners have talked about for a MRF is property tax or availability <br />fees. The municipalities feel that solid waste management should be paid for from County property taxes.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.