Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-04-2004-9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 03-04-2004
>
Agenda - 03-04-2004-9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2011 9:58:13 AM
Creation date
4/18/2011 9:57:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/4/2004
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
ORD-2004-010 - PD-1-03 State Employees Credit Union Addition Rezoning & Class A Special Use Permit
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2004
RES-2004-011 2004 Rate Order Resolution for Cable Services in Unincorporated Orange Co (2)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 DRAFT <br />1 You would also have a new building that would be built on the southern end of the property, <br />2 about 635 square feet, which would be a remote teller station for the employees to work <br />3 there, handling the new, relocated drive-through lanes. And here, they're requesting a total <br />4 of five drive-thru lanes -one ATM, and one of them would be an addition - so it would be a <br />5 25 percent expansion of what they have. And we'll get into that in just a couple of minutes. <br />6 Also, there would be a 2000 square foot canopy that would be built over those drive-thru <br />7 lanes. So, all told, it's about an additional 2334 sq. foot addition to the site. <br />8 <br />9 The water and sewer currently are provided by Hillsborough and would continue to be <br />10 served by Hillsborough. They would work through the Hillsborough requirements to expand <br />11 the water and sewer within their site. <br />12 <br />13 We have received agency comments from the Sheriffs Department. They've not had any - <br />14 issues with it.. Emergency Management, i.e. the Fire Marshall, has indicated that they would <br />15 not have any problems servicing the area. And NCDOT has provided some comments <br />16 relating to the access. Right now, you currently have a full service access on N.C. 86 and a <br />17 full service access on Oakdale. <br />18 - <br />19 What they (credit union) had-requested on-this plan was another full-service access to the <br />20 south. One of DOT's comments was that access would be too close to the business park <br />21 access - "Millstone" -and that they would recommend that that driveway be relocated <br />22 because the intersection is too close. <br />23 <br />24 Staff also is recommending that that one [southern drive] be eliminated on this plan, and to <br />25 continue to use the driveway on the nor#hern side on the existing site. <br />26 <br />27 There are some performance standards that they have not -well, first off, under your <br />28 ordinance: If a developer or an applicant cannot meet all of the requirements of the <br />29 particular district in which they're located, they can ask for minor deviations from the plan. <br />30 And the Board has the ability to approve those minor deviations if there is a .public purpose <br />31 =-.or..a public benefit.that-could be derived from making those deviations. <br />_ _ -_. :: <br />32 - - -: __ <br />33 The first one is the maximum floor area in the ED-Limited Office-1--in the Linear Office <br />34 District. That district is set up for a minimum 20,000 square foot size lot. We have minimum <br />35 -maximum floor area ratios of 5,000 square feet for each building of that 20,000 square <br />36 feet. So, roughly 25 percent of the lot could be covered with the building(s). <br />37 <br />38 This particular zoning lot, once you do the recombination for the two properties, will be 3.25 <br />39 acres or 141,000± square feet. So, if you played out the 20,000 square foot lot, that would <br />40 be the equivalent of about seven 20,000 square foot lots that you could actually build on if <br />41 they were all individually subdivided and then brought back in with their 5,000 square foot <br />42 maximums each. Well, they're not proposing to do that. <br />43 <br />44 The other thing that could've happened on this site is, had they not purchased the property, <br />45 that adjacent property could have been subdivided into 20,000 square foot lots and each. of <br />46 those could have come back with 5,000 square foot additions. So, roughly 10,000 square <br />47 feet could have been built if that adjacent property had been sold, if someone else had <br />48 purchased it, and they legally subdivided it and then brought back a request. <br />49 <br />~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.