Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-04-2004-9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 03-04-2004
>
Agenda - 03-04-2004-9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2011 9:58:13 AM
Creation date
4/18/2011 9:57:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/4/2004
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
ORD-2004-010 - PD-1-03 State Employees Credit Union Addition Rezoning & Class A Special Use Permit
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2004
RES-2004-011 2004 Rate Order Resolution for Cable Services in Unincorporated Orange Co (2)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 20 DRAFT ~Q 3 <br />1 traveled road in this part of the County. And just because NCDOT does things in a stupid <br />2 way doesn't mean that we have to perpetuate it. <br />3 <br />4 If that's their recommendation, fine. But, drive up Churton Street. There are all sorts of <br />5 examples of this. The taper for the left turn lane starts almost at that same point. So you <br />6 have people who think they're moving left, to get in the left #urn lane, people turning left, <br />7 and people coming this way. As Barry [Katz] said, as it gets more highly trafficked, it just <br />8 gets worse. To say that it's programmed without funding, is to say that we wish it will be <br />9 true, but there's no guarantee that that's going to happen. <br />10 <br />11 And I think, that where it's within our purview - we saw this with the Super WalMart, which <br />12 was not within our purview -and we can see a way to make a traffic improvement, in <br />13~ advance of when DOT might get the funding five or ten or fifteen years from now, we ought' <br />14 to go ahead and do it. <br />15 <br />16 There's a 2300 square foot house on the new lot, is that correct? What is to happen to it? <br />17 <br />18 Robert Davis There's a small structure there right now. They had talked about moving it, <br />19 or. allowing it to be moved. There was some discussion; I don't know if they're still on that <br />20 track or not. They were, or at least one the gentlemen with the Credit Union was, open to <br />21 that, it seems to be in fairly good shape. It possibly could be moved. <br />22 <br />23 Commissioner Halkiotis There are two different structures there. There is a house and a <br />24 workshop out back. So, which one are you talking about? <br />25 -- <br />26 Robert Davis The house is the one I'm speaking of. <br />27 <br />28 Commissioner Jacobs I'm just asking what's on there. I thought I saw..." <br />29 <br />30 Robert Davis Yes,~there's an existing structure. <br />- _31' _. - - -_ ~. -- <br />32 - Commissioner Halkiotis There's a :good size..garage-workshop,- freestanding, _out back. <br />33 - - <br />34 Commissioner Jacobs I assume that we would require that it be deconstructed or <br />35 whatever if it wasn't moved. <br />36 <br />37 Robert Davis We haven't addressed that. We can add that as a condition. <br />38 <br />39 Commissioner Jacobs I would certainly want to add that. Just a couple more comments. <br />40 I was taking notes about the right-in and the right-out, which I also support. Those of you <br />41 who drive on Old 86, there's alert-turn lane into Cornwallis Hills -DOT did not require that, <br />42 They didn't think it was necessary when Cornwallis Hills was built. The Orange County <br />43 Planning Board thought that it was necessary. The County Commissioners agreed. And I <br />44 think anybody who drives through there, is very glad there's a left tum lane there for <br />45 Cornwallis Hills. The whole discussion that we had in working on the Economic <br />46 Development District, regarding the limitation on drive-thrus, was exactly what you said, <br />47 Sam. We are trying to change the way that people do business. For better or for worse, <br />48 we're in an air quality non-attainment area, and, to me, to build more drive-through lanes is <br />49 only to encourage people to stay in their cars, as opposed to, since the standards require a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.