Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-19-2011 - 8c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 04-19-2011
>
Agenda - 04-19-2011 - 8c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2011 11:36:30 AM
Creation date
4/15/2011 11:36:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/19/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8c
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-19-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />a development in Area A along Bowman Road than it would be to pay for the major extension <br />required to serve a development in the Phase 2 portion of the EDD. Regardless, because Area <br />A is near existing development, it has the potential to develop before the Buckhorn-Mebane <br />EDD Phase 2 area. <br />Land Use Plan <br />If the gravity outfall in Option 2 is chosen, there are some Land Use Plan changes that would <br />have to made in Area A, north of Bowman Road. There has been a preliminary meeting with <br />area residents in the Option 2 area. Staff explained the background of the area relating to land <br />use and utility engineering. Staff will be proposing a Land Use Plan amendment for this area <br />for the May 2011 quarterly public hearing to be consistent with the WASMPBA. The Efland- <br />Mebane Small Area Plan recommended the change for this area from AR (Agricultural <br />Residential) to Mixed Use (a new land use category) with a limited residential component. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: Choosing design Option 1 will not result in any changes in either current <br />design cost or the currently estimated construction cost in the County's draft Capital Investment <br />Plan for FY2011-2016. Choosing design Option 2 will result in a maximum design cost increase <br />of $8,000 which can be accomplished within the present budget. Construction estimates are in <br />the Capital Investment Plan but are presently unfunded. A $675,000 increase in the total <br />project construction cost could be lessened by the lower bid costs that are presently being <br />realized in current economic conditions. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board: <br />1. Approve design Option 2 to add a 'backbone' gravity sewer to 423 acres; <br />2. Direcf staff (Attorney, Planning, Financial Services) to initiate any contract amendments <br />necessary; <br />3. Authorize the County Manager to sign the contract amendment; and <br />4. Authorize staff to begin necessary Land Use Plan amendments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.