Browse
Search
Minutes - 19981123
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Minutes - 19981123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:43:30 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:37:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/23/1998
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-23-1998
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
Agenda - 11-23-1998 - C1 (a)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
Agenda - 11-23-1998 - C2 (b,c)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
Agenda - 11-23-1998 - C2 (d)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
Agenda - 11-23-1998 - C3 (a)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
Agenda - 11-23-1998 - C4 (a)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
development is contemplated, moderate densities ranging from two to four dwelling units per <br />acre are permitted. Adjacent properties to the west, north and east are within the 185/Buckhorn <br />Road EDD; properties south of West Ten Road are in the R-1 Rural Residential Zoning District. <br />The entire area is within the U-ENO-PW Upper Eno Protected Watershed Overlay District. A <br />Major Transportation Corridor (MTC) Overlay District extends southward 1,250 feet from 1-40 & I- <br />85 right-of-way and covers the northern third of the subject property. Use of land within the MTC <br />Overlay District for single family and two-family dwellings is not subject to the provisions, <br />requirements and restrictions of that overlay district. <br />QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: <br />None. <br />QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD: <br />None. <br />QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS FROM CITIZENS: <br />Ms. Mabel Allison, a resident of West Ten Road in Efland, owns property on the East and <br />North side of this property. She feels that changing the zoning of this property will effect their <br />land. They are concerned and opposed to the rezoning of this property. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis, to <br />refer the proposed Zoning Atlas amendment to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be <br />returned no sooner than February 2, 1999. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />3. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment <br />a) Cane Creek Watershed Overlay Districts <br />4 4. Subdivision Regulations Text Amendment <br />a) Flexible Development in Cane Creek Watershed <br />These items were presented together by Planner David Stancil for the purpose of <br />receiving citizen comment on proposed text amendments to the Orange County Zoning <br />Ordinance and to the Orange County Subdivision Regulations to implement new development <br />standards for Cane Creek Watershed. Changes are proposed to Section 2.2 (Definitions) and <br />Section 6.23 (Extra Requirements for Watershed Protection Overlay Districts) of the Zoning <br />Ordinance to implement new watershed protection measures for Cane Creek watershed. These <br />changes, along with the companion amendments to the Subdivision Regulations, result from a <br />three-year study of Cane Creek Watershed conducted by the Orange Water and Sewer Authority <br />(OWASA) and subsequent recommendations by the OWASA Board of Directors in October, <br />1997. The amendments to the Zoning Ordinance would offer two sets of development standards <br />for protecting water quality. The first option would change the minimum lot size for new <br />development in the watershed from two acres to five acres, with a provision allowing up to five <br />lots as small as two acres in size for all lots of record. A second option is available for Flexible <br />Development in Cane Creek watershed. In this special option, new major subdivision <br />development could occur at the current two-acre lot density, but new proposed standards for the <br />County's Subdivision Regulations would change the amount of open space from 33% to 50%. <br />Q:\19981123.doc®
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.