Browse
Search
Minutes - 19981123
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Minutes - 19981123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:43:30 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:37:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/23/1998
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-23-1998
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
Agenda - 11-23-1998 - C1 (a)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
Agenda - 11-23-1998 - C2 (b,c)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
Agenda - 11-23-1998 - C2 (d)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
Agenda - 11-23-1998 - C3 (a)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
Agenda - 11-23-1998 - C4 (a)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 11-23-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
property, but asks that the developer and the county be reasonable about what gets put <br />into that property. That is all he is asking. About three months ago a piece of property in <br />this neighborhood was designated to be one of only two "occupied" historic landmarks in <br />the county. One is right across the street from this proposed development. That will <br />affect the value of this house. The eloquent presentation by the developer was so good <br />he started wishing he lived there and then he realized what was being discussed. They <br />are very professional in their presentation and they are good developers. He is against <br />this development as it is designed now. <br />Mr. Scott Ray stated that he lives less than one mile away from this proposed <br />development. He is not opposed to the development. It could be less dense with more <br />area around the houses. He understands that they are trying to maximize their profits off <br />of this piece of land. There are a couple of concerns that no one has raised yet. One of <br />those concerns is character. It does not fit into the character of the surrounding area. <br />That many houses in that small area is out of the character of the community. His second <br />concern is not the amount of water to fight fires, but rather the amount of personnel <br />available to fight fires. There needs to be some comment from the Emergency Services <br />Director or the fire chiefs as to whether or not they can adequately supply the personnel to <br />fight fires in that area, especially with the OSHA regulations for "two-in and two-out". <br />There would have to be at least five people on the scene before the fire can even be <br />fought, with two people each on the pipe line and on the line outside the residence. <br />Hillsborough currently runs three or four First Responder calls a day and Eno also runs <br />First Responder calls. Those will be the standard Mutual Aid departments. He is not sure <br />that they will have the personnel to fight the fires. On a 7,000 square foot lot you better <br />get fire fighters there in a hurry or you will burn several houses down. The development is <br />lacking in common sense. The Comprehensive Plan may say that it could contain that <br />many homes, but it does not necessarily say that it should contain that many homes. <br />Mr. Jim Ray stated that putting 237 houses in this small area is going to cause an <br />excess of drainage toward the north. He operates a golf course to the north of this <br />property and he estimates that they will get 2/3 of the drainage from the development. <br />They use that water for irrigation. They now have a problem from the years that this has <br />been a farm. Every time it rained during plowing season, the drainage came to their <br />property. They have ponds deep in muck now from the runoff. When they start building <br />this development they will have much more runoff making this problem much worse during <br />the entire time they are building until buildout is complete. They say that they will put in a <br />pump station; if the pump station ever malfunctions, the runoff will go to his irrigation pond. <br />Vandalism is another concern to him. Each of these homes will have approximately 2 <br />children. They will need a place to play. There are not many places for them to play in <br />this area. Soccer fields are next to the neighbors, not in the middle of the community, so <br />the noise will affect the people who already live there, not the new residents. They <br />already have a problem with vandalism and this will make it worse. This is also going to <br />impact the schools. The roads cannot handle this additional traffic. He mentioned that he <br />thought that "infill" was intended to start in town and move out from there. He does not <br />think that starting in the county and moving back into town is what is meant by "infill" <br />Q:\19981123.doc®
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.