Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-12-2011 - 5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 04-12-2011
>
Agenda - 04-12-2011 - 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2011 9:20:27 AM
Creation date
4/12/2011 9:20:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/12/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-12-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />Excerpts of some of these historical documents and plans are provided herein, others are <br />available in full upon request. <br />While the 1988 Master Plan was expanded upon, enhanced and in some cases updated by <br />these efforts, the 1988 Plan remains the governing document for the County's physical plan for <br />parks and recreation (with the exception of new goals and objectives adopted in the 2030 <br />Comprehensive Plan). <br />At the October 12, 2010 work session, the Board indicated an interest in updating or creating a <br />new Master Plan -noting the many changes that have occurred since 1988, the need to revisit <br />the operating principles of that plan in light of the passage of time, and the fact that the 1988 <br />Plan is now considered outdated by State grant agencies for future matching purposes. It is <br />also noteworthy that one of the objectives in the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan is in fact <br />the creation of a new Master Plan. <br />Over the past several months, staff has worked to evaluate the 1988 Plan, look at model new <br />plan templates, examine parks and open space plans from other counties in North Carolina and <br />surrounding states, and develop an outline of an approach for creating a new Comprehensive <br />Parks and Recreation Master Plan, consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and other <br />plans and documents, with a goal of completing the effort by June 30, 2012. A paper outlining <br />this approach is provided as Attachment 1, including a draft outline of the proposed Plan. Staff <br />will also present examples of other recent or notable county parks and open space plans and a <br />possible timetable of action. For consistency with the overall County Comprehensive Plan, the <br />proposed target year for the new master plan is also 2030. Finally, staff poses some "Key <br />Questions" for the Board to ponder, matters that would need to be addressed in a new Plan. <br />While three options for pursuing a new plan are noted, staff's recommended approach is to <br />pursue ahybrid/augmented staff resource method to the creation of the plan, with substantial <br />involvement of existing staff in DEAPR and solicited assistance from other departments in <br />certain areas of special expertise. Data collection, research, graphics, and initial drafting would <br />be conducted by a temporary staff person to be hired for the duration of the project. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: If moving forward with an updated plan during FY 2011-12 is desired, <br />staffs preferred option (DEAPR staff coordination with temporary staff assistance) would <br />involve hiring a temporary employee as noted above. The cost for this person, plus other <br />associated public information and logistical costs, is projected at $22,000. Hiring of an outside <br />consultant to create the plan could cost between $90-150,000 based on recent plans completed <br />or underway in other jurisdictions. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board consider the proposed <br />format and process for a new Master Plan, and provide feedback to management and staff on <br />the desirability of moving forward, a timeframe and cost. <br />In particular, Board thoughts and feedback on the two "Key Questions" on page 5 of this <br />agenda abstract item would help provide framework for moving forward. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.