Browse
Search
1972 S Agreement - Municipal & County Landfill Agreement
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
1970's
>
1972 S Agreement - Municipal & County Landfill Agreement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2016 11:13:28 AM
Creation date
4/5/2011 11:48:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/21/1972
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agreement
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> 504 <br /> This meeting was held for the purpose of meeting in joint session with <br /> the County Planning Board to conduct a public hearing to consider amendments <br /> to the County Zoning Map and the County Zoning Ordinance. <br /> Chairman Bennett called the meeting to order and announced that this was <br /> the time and place of the duly advertised public hearing. Chairman Bennett <br /> turned the chair over to Charles Johnston, Chairman of the County Planning <br /> Board. Mr. Johnston conducted the public hearing. For minutes of this public <br /> hearing see the Orange County Planning Board minute docket. <br /> At the conclusion of the public hearing Chairman Johnston turned the chair <br /> back to Chairman Bennett and Chairman Bennett then adjourned the meeting. <br /> I <br /> Harvey D. Bennett, Chairman <br /> S. M. Gattis, Acting Clerk <br /> --------------------------- <br /> I <br /> MINUTES OF THE ORANGE COUNTY <br /> BOARD OF <br /> November 28,1972 <br /> The Board of Commissioners of Orange County met in the District Courtroom <br /> of the Courthouse in Hillsborough on Tuesday, November 28, 1972, at 7:30 o'clock <br /> P.M. <br /> Members Present: Chairman Harvey D. Bennett and Commissioners William C. Ray, <br /> Henry S. Walker, Ira A. Ward and C. Norman Walker. <br /> Members Absent: None <br /> Chairman Bennett stated the Board of Commissioners would consider the appeals <br /> of the tax assessment of W. L. Turner, owner of the Acres of New Hope Subdivision. <br /> Mr. Turner had based his appeal on the fact it was unreasonable to change the <br /> assessment basis of the lots in his subdivision from an acreage method to an <br /> individual lot method. <br /> The Tax Supervisor stated that he recommended the assessment be left on a <br /> per lot basis. Discussion ensued. <br /> Upon motion of Commissioner Ira A. Ward, seconded by Commissioner Henry S. <br /> Walker, it was moved and adopted, that the tax assessment of W. L. Turner, owner <br /> of Acres of New Hope Subdivision, be assessed on a per lot basis. <br /> Chairman Bennett stated the Board of Commissioners would consider the appeals <br /> of the tax assessment of Joe Mathews, owner of Hills of New Hope Subdivision. Mr. <br /> Mathews had based his appeal on the fact it was unreasonable to change the assessment <br /> basis of the lots in his subdivision from an acreage method to an individual lot <br /> method. <br /> The Tax Supervisor stated he recommended the assessment be left on a per lot <br /> basis. Discussion ensued. . <br /> Upon motion of Commissioner Ira A. Ward, seconded by Commissioner Henry S. <br /> Walker, it was moved and adopted, that the tax assessment of Joe Mathews, owner <br /> of Hills of New Hope Subdivision, be assessed on a per lot basis. <br /> Chairman Bennett stated the Board would consider the appeal of R. S. Lloyd <br /> on the R. S. Lloyd Subdivision. <br /> The Tax Supervisor reported to the Board that he recommended assessment of the <br /> lots under consideration. <br /> The Board stated that it felt these assessments were too high as no consideration <br /> was being given to the lots Mr. Lloyd owned on undeveloped streets. <br /> The Tax Supervisor was directed to allow an additional ten percent (104%) <br /> depreciation on those lots on the undeveloped streets. <br /> l <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.