Browse
Search
Minutes 02-28-2011
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Minutes 02-28-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2015 2:47:44 PM
Creation date
4/5/2011 8:41:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/28/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-28-2011
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 02-28-2011
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 02-28-2011
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 02-28-2011
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 02-28-2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Gordon said that the comments do not have to be revisited, but she does <br /> not want to truncate the process. <br /> Larry Wright said that the minutes of the Planning Board show that there were a few <br /> members that were uncomfortable with the fact that some County Commissioners said that the <br /> UDO does not have to be 100% perfect. Some of the motions from that meeting were <br /> conditional, so the votes included those conditions. <br /> Chair Pelissier said that she has no problems with changing the wording of the motion <br /> and she does not want to discuss the semantics. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz said that he objected having this item brought to the Board of <br /> County Commissioners at the last minute because he has not had a chance to study these <br /> proposed motions. He said that he will vote against it because of the way it was presented. <br /> Commissioner McKee said that he had concerns too about doing this at the last minute. <br /> Chair Pelissier said that she would be fine with the original staff recommendations. <br /> VOTE: Ayes, 4; Nays, 3 (Commissioner McKee, Commissioner Yuhasz and Chair Pelissier) <br /> C. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS <br /> 1. Unified Development Ordinance— Continued November 22, 2010 public hearing to <br /> receive public comments on the proposed Unified Development Ordinance. <br /> Craig Benedict and Planner Perdita Holtz made a PowerPoint presentation. <br /> ORANGE COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE <br /> Continued Public Hearing <br /> February 28, 2011 <br /> Quick Presentation Overview <br /> Highlights <br /> Project Scope <br /> Public Participation During this Process <br /> First Draft <br /> Public Hearing Draft <br /> Proposed Modifications to November 2010 Draft <br /> Conditional Districts <br /> "Implementation Bridge" <br /> Highlights <br /> November 22, 2010 public hearing continued to tonight to allow for more public review time <br /> County's UDO applies to Orange County's Planning jurisdiction <br /> County's Comprehensive Plan <br /> Guides Zoning Legislative Decisions <br /> Rezonings are still pursuant to Section 1.1.7 conformance with Adopted Plans <br /> Joint Planning Area (JPA) Agreement still applies Process, Uses, Land Use Map <br /> Rural Buffer guidelines are the same <br /> No Change to Watersheds <br /> Economic Development Framework <br /> What This Phase Doesn't Do <br /> Does not change approval processes, or <br /> What use can be asked for in what area <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.