Orange County NC Website
� <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Hemminger <br /> to approve Budget Amendment #7-B appropriating $192,719 of fund balance in the General <br /> Fund for transfer to the School Capital Project Fund. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> c. Proposed Chanqes to the Upper Neuse River Basin Association Bvlaws <br /> The Board considered proposed changes to the Upper Neuse River Basin Association <br /> bylaws and related information. <br /> County Attorney John Roberts reviewed this item: <br /> Members of the Upper Neuse River Basin Association (UNRBA) have recently <br /> considered proposed change to the bylaws governing the organization. These changes are a <br /> result of: <br /> 1) The General Assembly's passage of HB 1765 in 2010, which included details <br /> concerning the establishment of the Falls Lake Watershed Association; <br /> 2) The adoption of the Falls Lake Nutrient Management Strategy by the NC <br /> Environmental management Commission (EMC) in 2010; and <br /> 3) The 2010 adoption of the Consensus Principles to Guide Falls Lake Nutrient <br /> Management Strategy by Triangle area local governments. <br /> The UNRBA was founded in 1996 as a 501(c)3 corporation to provide a means for local <br /> governments located in the upper reaches of the Neuse River basin, including Orange County, <br /> to work tougher on preserving water quality n the upper Neuse River basin. Orange County is <br /> a longstanding member of the UNRBA, and Commissioner Pam Hemminger is currently the <br /> Chair of the UNRBA Board of Directors. <br /> Recently, some directors of the UNRBA expressed concern that as a 501(c)3 <br /> organization, the UNRBA was effectively prohibited from conducting significant lobbying <br /> activities, per the IRS code concerning non-profit organization. Several UNRBA jurisdictions <br /> have concluded that lobbying various state agencies such as the Division of Water Quality <br /> (DWQ) and the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) concerning Stage II of the <br /> Falls Lake Nutrient Management Strategy may be beneficial. As a reminder, the fiscal note <br /> developed for the Falls Lake nutrient management strategy estimated the total cost of <br /> implementation of the rules to be approximately $1.5 billion, most of which would "kick in" at <br /> Stage II of the Falls Lake rules. <br /> Approximately $1.25 billion dollars of this total is estimated as the cost to local <br /> governments in the upper Neuse River basin. Most of this figure is estimated to be the cost to <br /> comply with two areas of the nutrient management strategy: <br /> - The rules associated with stormwater emanating from existing development, and <br /> - The upgrading of wastewater treatment plants to reduce the nutrient loading in their <br /> discharges <br /> The final Nutrient Management Strategy requires that the EMC re-evaluate the nutrient <br /> management strategy prior to the initiation of Stage II of the strategy in the year 2026. The <br /> collection of necessary data to permit a re-examination of the Nutrient Management Strategy <br /> could begin as early as this year. The re-examination of the Falls Lake Nutrient Management <br /> Strategy is likely to include consideration of the conditions of the lake, and the effectiveness of <br /> the nutrient management strategy versus the cost of complying with the Stage I and Stage li <br /> nutrient management rules as currently written. The re-examination could also include <br /> evaluation of the current uses of the lake, the cost of achieving (or attempting to achieve)the <br /> Stage II nutrient reduction goals, and whether alternative water quality standards may be <br />