Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2012 4:47:24 PM
Creation date
4/1/2011 11:45:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/5/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-05-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mar O2 11 07;14 Alice Gordon 9~9-967-383 35 <br />1~ <br />~1~CR~4~D~~ ~ ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~~~~~~ <br />T~: grange Jaunty ~lanni~ng ~~ard <br />Fr~r~: Cow~~issiorter Alioe ~~rd~n <br />~r~ otl Unifed De~rel~prnent ~rdinance~ - Ga~n~en~ and Sug~e~ted <br />Re. p <br />Changes <br />Date: March ~, 2D~~ <br />As re uested on Februa~r fig, # am submitking carnrnen and suggested changes <br />to the proposed Unified Develapr~ent Ordinance ~UI~O~. <br />In the two da s since the (~u~arterly Public 4~earirrg, I have written this document <br />Y <br />Frith the cam~ments and suggested changes that !can make at the present #~rne. <br />' a~ue not hid time to reexamine the entire U~, ~ am sure there are other <br />since ! h ~ ~e used <br />' t at are deservi of pare study. Also, I should ~ent~an that i ha <br />~ect~ons h ~ <br />me of the sub~n~tked written cemments ~n the docurnent~ but have <br />the language of s~ <br />nor had the time to farmal~ provide a citation. <br />Dyne of these corn~nents and changes suggest that Conditional districts be <br />S <br />restricted to certain areas of the County. if that is not posy:b#e right now far <br />'onal Use Districts CUDs~, they might instead have certain criteria attached <br />Cond~ti ~ ~ <br />'ch have the effec# of restnciing hem to certain meas. !n same cases, I ha e <br />why <br />su ested same criteria. Far Conditional Zoning Districts ~GZDs~, ~t ~s rn~ <br />g9 t 'cted to certain areas of the County. <br />understanding that thay might be yes n <br />This ~a~ument bas the ~oli~~ir~g major oampanents. <br />This Cover l~lernarandum <br />RC?PCSEC~ UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE JUDO} <br />~ , <br />Comments and Prap~csed Changes from Camrntss~oner Gordon <br />March ~, 2a1~ <br />' an of CQNDiTIONA~ DISTRICTS in the Prc~vsed Unified Development <br />Cam~par~s <br />v~ith PLANNED DEWELOp~lENT DISTRICTS in the Ex~sfing Grange <br />Qrd~nance <br />County Zoning Ordinance. . <br />Sec. ~.? CONDITIONAL D1~tR1~~'S <br />Article ~ - ~AS~ ZONING DISTRICTS <br />' Sec. ~.7 - ADDIT#ONAL STANDARDS FC~R ~iPD~C~ <br />and Article ~, <br />~DDITIONA~. SEDTI~NS TO BE REIliEWED <br />far our consideration of these comtnants and suggested changes. <br />Thank you y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.