Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2012 4:47:24 PM
Creation date
4/1/2011 11:45:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/5/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-05-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
26 <br />36. Under (5) (b): 16 feet should be 18 feet so that a passenger car can be passed by fire <br />apparatus. For Class B roads with 3 or more lots, there should be an area 20 feet wide <br />by 50 feet long every 1500 feed to that fire apparatus can pass each other. <br />37.4n ~I}, remove the word "incandescent" since LED lights are now often used for holiday <br />decorations. Low wattage is not defined, but a typical nightlightlbig Christmas tree bulb <br />is 7 watts so you could say any wattage under 10 watts. It would make more sense to <br />use a lumen rating, such as less than 150 lumens. ~n ~J}, first off this should be a lumen <br />limit, not watts. As the limit reads, this looks like a total lumens for any given motion <br />activated switch. The lumens looks like it was derived from two incandescent ?'5 watt <br />bulbs, probably flood lights. Nate that if this is the case, the maxim lumens should be <br />2400. There are many motion activated systems where a sensor can turn on multiple <br />light fixtures. So I would re-word this to have a 2400 lumen limit per light fixture <br />controlled by the sensor. Finally, on this max lumens per fixture, there are standard <br />outdoor floodlight fixtures that take 3 bulbs. For those fxtures, a reasonable max <br />lumens would be around 3600. You could also add a limit of no one bulb can exceed a <br />rating of 2100 lumens ~a 120 watt equivalent} if the intent is to avoid the larger single <br />bulb fixtures -- Section 6.11.3. This is where a definition of "mercury vapor luminaries" is <br />needed. As written, this could mean that any standard fluorescent or compact <br />fluorescent light could not be used, since they are amercury-phosphorous based light. <br />38. ~C}~1 } Some floodlight fixtures do not cover the bulb, the stop just after the threaded <br />base. I'd just stick with the 45 degree from vertical. ~c} ~2} the "it will shine" is vague, <br />Perhaps something like "no more than 5% of the luminous energy shall shine towards <br />roadways, onto adjacent residential property or into the night sky". ~C} ~3} Same <br />vagueness- what is the "main beam"? Do you really want to say that no portion of the <br />bulb shall be visible from adjacent properties or the public street right-of way? From an <br />enforcement point of view, a "Can't see the bulb" is easy to verify for both the owner and <br />the inspector. Note that this is the approach taken on page 6-97, 6.111 ~3}. <br />39. All existing and proposed public transportation services and facilities within A RADIUS of <br />one mile of the site shall be documented ~ leave out "also"} -- Section 6.17~B} #~4}. <br />40. This whole section should be looked at with respect to goals and objectives in the <br />Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan and Commissioners' goals and <br />objectives. County policies do not always support the land development ordinances, <br />particularly with transportation issues. This is too vast a task to address at this time, but <br />I wanted to "tag" this Section for future study -- Section 7.8 <br />41. Move towards intense use of sites to save more of the site in open space -~ cluster <br />subdivisions. Cluster subdivisions require community wastewater systems. Falls apart <br />on political side. Commissioners very wary due to system failures 20 years ago. Is <br />there a way to put this in the Qrdinance `by right" if designed to specific cri#eria? Take <br />political part out. <br />42. Need to update Lighting Standards. Height requirements for outdoor light poles and <br />potential impacts on County recreational facilities is one of the areas that should be <br />revisited, <br />A-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.