Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 8a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 8a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2011 11:30:10 AM
Creation date
4/1/2011 11:29:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/5/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-05-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />recommendation, the Board may want to consider the County Manager's concept of instituting a <br />tipping fee surcharge with the intent of generating, over the remaining life of the facility, funds <br />for landfill neighborhood improvements. Currently the FY 201111 ~ projection of municipal solid <br />waste tonnage is 48,000 tons. This means that each dollar on the tipping fee would generate <br />about $48,000 annually. Staff would weCcome any guidance on the concept of a tipping fee <br />surcharge, subjectto any legal constraints regarding the use of enterprise fund monies. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: The financial impact of extending landfill capacity could be considerable <br />for Qrange County and the Interlocal Agreement partners has well as other users}. Qption 1 <br />would generate about $6,32,500 gross additional revenue knot including operational expenses} <br />and delay expenditures for closure over current projections and permit authority by about ~.5 <br />years. Qption 2 would generate about $8,896,500 gross additional revenue and delay <br />expenditures for closure for about 3.5 years. Qption 3 would generate about $11,767,500 gross <br />additional revenue and delay expenditures for closure for about 4.5 years. <br />The extension of time would provide additional opportunity fior building the closurelpost-closure <br />reserve fund. Additionally, extension of landfill life would delay incurring the additional <br />expenses by all Interlocal Agreement partners related to the hauling of waste to the City of <br />Durham Transfer Station. This additional time could also give local governments more time to <br />investigate more permanent andlor less costly long term alternatives to utilization of the Durham <br />Transfer Station. <br />RECOMMENDATI4N~S~: The Manager recommends that the Board provide guidance to staff <br />with regard to the staff recommendation of Option 2 or other related landfill capacity issues. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.