Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2012 3:53:44 PM
Creation date
4/1/2011 11:23:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/5/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-05-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
ORD-2011-013 Unified Development Ordinance and Repeal All Existing Ordinances See ON line Version
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-032 Resolution Adopting a Unified Development Ordinance and Repeal All Prior Existing UDO Ordinances
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
89 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />7 <br />9 <br />~g <br />11 <br />~2 <br />13 <br />~4 <br />~5 <br />~~ <br />~7 <br />1~ <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />Z~ <br />27 <br />2~ <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />3~ <br />37 <br />3~ <br />39 <br />4g <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />~~~ <br />~Q <br />This will give us all the benefits desired to move our economic deveiopn~ent <br />program forward i1 a tip ~ rely arranner. <br />Secondly, we ask that you create a new conditional zoning district for the rural areas <br />~rhere we'd recommend the following specifications: <br />Reinstate guiding language around planned development districts including <br />mixed use, residential, commercial, office, and of course industrial <br />Reinstate special use permits - at (east antic we can get better zoning in <br />place. <br />Increase the minimum tract size toy 00 acres <br />Eliminate incompatible uses such as intense industrial and commercial ~- <br />which isn't realistic in a rural area without infrastructure. <br />we believe that well defined conditional districts provide many benefits for our <br />community Put trying to force the rural community, with our very different characfier and <br />purpose, into a single floating district tailored to the EDDs doesn't serve us well. Qnce <br />this ordinance is approved by the Poard,....it becomes law.....and we'd appreciate your <br />consideration in making it a meaningful law far the rural community. <br />~peake~ 3A was~ewate~ T~ea~~e~~ Sys~e~s ~ochael ~~ghes} <br />There have been changes to the definition of wastewater treatment systems -- <br />which we were told includes new commercial septic systems in the rural areas -~ <br />something that we believe will help rural businesses like Fiesta Grill. The language is <br />pretty broad and includes "systems that discharge effluent to surface waters and, other <br />systems that maybe permitted by the county health department or the state". <br />That covers a lot more than commercial septic systems in the rural areas--and <br />with conditional districts that can float anywhere in the county, these systems further <br />enable applications that may be incompatible. <br />we believe that this type of change could be a good idea but it belongs in Phase <br />Z so that it can be properly researched and discussed in the context of Small Area Pions <br />and Conditional zoning for Agricultural Support Enterprises. <br />Delaying this change should have no impact on the EDDs which have water and sewer. <br />Please reinstate the vld definitions of wastewater treatment systems anti[ they can be <br />more fully discussed in Phase 2. <br />Speaker 4~ Chapel Nill ~~peraence ~~~th C®~ditl~na~ ~ist~icts ~~ulae hcClintackg <br />Nedghb~~s fir Respcnslble Gr®w~h} <br />Neighbors for Responsible Growth <br />February ~S, .~0~1 <br />Grange County Commissioners <br />Neighbors for Responsible Growth appreciates the County staff making themselves <br />available for a presentation on the proposed Unified Development Qrdinance a few <br />weeks ago. It was a useful session and enabled us to understand the proposal better. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.