Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
84 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />S <br />9 <br />1Q <br />1~ <br />~Z <br />13 <br />~4 <br />15 <br />16 <br />~7 <br />1~ <br />19 <br />Zg <br />Z1 <br />~2 <br />~3 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />2S <br />Z9 <br />30 <br />31 <br />3~ <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />3~ <br />39 <br />4g <br />4~ <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />4~ <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />~~~ ~ <br />Navernber i~, 204 <br />November 22, 20~ o QPl-1 <br />January2~, 20~~ <br />.~ <br />Letters to Iota[ governments <br />~n[y Carrboro requested a presentation <br />Followed by staff UDO material and discussion with Town staffs for explanation and <br />distribution to elected officials as necessary. <br />lnforrnal meetings: <br />February ~ ~, 2U~ ~ with Neighbors for Responsible Growth <br />February ~1, 20~ ~ with Orange County Voice <br />As needed with individuals <br />No written Local Government comments received as requested by BGCC by <br />February 2, 20~ ~ <br />Received Town of Carrboro Resolution an February 24 <br />~~ ~°s~ ~ raft <br />~ 0 months of staff and Planning Board work prior to First Draft <br />First Draft was released on August 9, 2010. <br />Public comments were accepted until September 2U, 20~ 0~ <br />Twa BUCC work sessions to reviewlcamment an First Draft <br />Two Planning Board meetings tv reviewlcomment on First Draft <br />Joint Planning Area JPA} partners were notified in August, pursuant to JPA <br />Agreement <br />~~b~~c ~ear~ng ~~aft <br />Released on November 6, 20~ o <br />JPA partners were notified of availability <br />Incorporated many of the comments made on the First Draft din color-called text} <br />Public hearing held November 22, 20~ 0 <br />Public hearing continued to February 28, 20~~ to a[lowfor additional public review <br />time <br />Additional ~~anning ~~ard review <br />Two Meetings in January <br />Conditional districts <br />Stream buffers <br />Additional Discussion February 2 <br />Culminated in vote ~7-~ } to recommend approval of the adoption of the entire <br />UD4 with the revisions presented at the meeting <br />Staff-recommended revisions after February 2 Planning Board <br />Draft UDO's added to Libraries <br />~®nditianal ®istricts <br />Replace Planned Development BPD} Districts <br />Much of the language in Section 3.7 and 6.'l conditional districts} comes from <br />existing PD language -has strong aspect of Comprehensive Plan <br />Conditional Use District <br />Conditional Zoning Districts <br />Comprehensive Plan and JPA Agreement still apply <br />