Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Section 3.~.3~B}~~} was recommended by Commissioner Gordon at the ~ove.mber ~~, X010 quarterly public hearing. This proposed change was reviewed by the Planning Board at the I~larch ~, ~®~ ~ and also recommended for approval. ~e~t~~~ ~~4~~ ~-The correct section reference eras added. ~e~t~~~ ~~~o~--The references to the outdated numbering method, not included in the UDG, are proposed for deletion. ~e~t~~~ ~~~ T~b9~ ~ ~e~n~~~t~d ~~~s - Based on comments heard at the l~ovember ~2, ~D~ o quarterly public hearing and Planning Board meetings, the Table of Permitted Uses was modified to more clearly distinguish the conditional coning districts from the general use districts. There are now 3 separate tables that make up the Table of Permitted Uses. ~~IgTE: reviewed by Planning Board at February ~, X01 ~ meeting; recommendation to approved Following the recammendat"ron of the Planning Board at the Larch ~, 201 ~ meeting, the tables were further modified with the P1D district deleted from the conditional caning districts table and added to the general use coning districts table. These changes are shown on the tables in this attachment. ~e~t~~~ ~a2~~~a® ~~~~~~a~i~n~ ®~ b~~~d~~ s ~~~n ~e ~~~e~e~~s ~-The modifications to this section include the addition of the correct references to the new correct ra hic that will be added as Figure 5.2.1 ~ .D, In addition, the text r gp associated with the current incorrect graphic shall be deleted. [111~TE: reviewed by Planning Board at February ~, 201 ~ meeting; recommendation to approve ® ~ect~®n 50~~~ a~ ®e~i n ~~~ndar°ds -~ The modifications to this section include the addition of the correct references to the new, correct graphic that will~be added as Figure 5.5.1.C.~. In addition, another correct graphicwill be added to this section Figure 5.5.1.0.5} and the text associated with the current incorrect graphic in this location shall be deleted. ~~1aTE: reviewed by Planning Board at February ~, X011 meeting; recommendation to approve ~ect~~n 5.~ 3A5 ~~es ~Ciawabd~ w~fih~n ~t~~am B~ff~~~ ~-The modifications to this section were recommended to the Planning Board following their lengthy discussion on the stream buffers section of the UD4, [NOTE. reviewed by Planning Board at February ~, X011 meeting; recommendation to approve ~e~t~~n ~~~ ~~~ beak ~n®f~ ~®~~~e ~-The only change to this section is a minor formatting change to subsection 5.14.S~B} with the addition of a subset ~~} which is comprised entirely of existing text already within the subsection.. This text was formatted incorrectly in the UDG Public Hearing Draft. CN4TEM reviewed by Planning Board at February 2, X011 meeting; recommendation to approve] ~ect~®n ?.~a4 B ~~~ ~~andards -~ An incorrect reference was deleted in subsection ~5}. CNGTE: reviewed by Planning Board at February ~, X011 meeting; recommendation to apprave~