Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2012 3:53:44 PM
Creation date
4/1/2011 11:23:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/5/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-05-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
ORD-2011-013 Unified Development Ordinance and Repeal All Existing Ordinances See ON line Version
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-032 Resolution Adopting a Unified Development Ordinance and Repeal All Prior Existing UDO Ordinances
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
192 <br />A~~achrnent to ~~CC fV~emo -Pale 1 <br />~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~o~ ~~~~~~~ <br />~~ ~8~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~g ~~~ ~ <br />The follov~in a es autline passible additians to the USG ta.address many of <br />gpg <br />the snare.! comments received at the public hearing. The UGC directed, by <br />g <br />motian that the Plannin ward consider addressing, where possible, earns of <br />g <br />the avererchin themes noted belov~. The informatian pravided is not a <br />g <br />recornrnendation from staff, rather passible saluti~ns if this is the caurse the <br />Planning Board andfar SPCC desire to take. <br />~ . ~e~anin Cansiderations see attachments .~ ~~ <br />a. Stronger link to the Comprehensive Plan, and <br />b. Guidance language in the UDG <br />2. Co~~itional ~istrac$s (see Attach~a~r~t 2) <br />Foc~a~ N9as~er Plan~~d Developments (6U@PD-C~) an ~~~~~y ~~b~~ ~~°~~~iti~~ <br />areas grad rural activity areas (i.~. Economic Deve9opa~sen~ aid o~G~er hagher <br />intensity Sand use designations) <br />3. VVate~sheds end UVas~errvat~r 1"reat~ent Svs~~ms (see !-~f~~chmen~ 3~ <br />~ofh of ghese co~cerr~~ are answered by an Issue ~~d R~~po~se s~a~ef. <br />Focused additions <br />The selections From the existing Planned ~evelapment section of the current <br />~anin ordinance Article ~}are provided as possible additions to address lte~n <br />g 4 <br />~ above. ,The u~ould be added to Section 3.~ `Conditional Districts'. These <br />reflect what staff believe to be the vast salient and measurable standards for <br />application of the conditional districts. <br />,Rdditional evaluation nay be necessary in UDO Phase II fv determine the <br />relationshi s assible conflicts Dui#h other portions of the UDG, and potential <br />pip <br />enforcement issues but in the interim are palatable to proceed v~ith. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.