Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~~ ~~~~ ~a ~~~~~~~~ ~~~r~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~'m Am ~eralar~an~ ~ live in grange ~~unty off o!d ~~ in ~arrbaro's Nar~h Study Area ~NSAd As ou rna knav~~ in ig~~'s arrbaro introduced candit£anal floating panes Within with the ~ elan but these panes never landed C arrbaro's fleeting caning gas ~`il(age iced l~sa~' ~- Which is narra~'er than the canditianal districts that tl~e county is cansidering~ `~~illage ~i~ed ~se~f allays residential end r~eighbarhaod commercial such as a lase! carnrnunity grocer gnat a chains or day care ar other bus~~ess that se~res tl~e carnrnunitya Na destination retai(~ nv industrial, no intense ~ammercia(a ~~~ ite this definitian~ landa~~+ners and d~velapers sere reluctant to apply far a ~aating pane p ~, "~ ° A ~ ~ ~~vela _ ers since she regu~rer~ents sere vague and d~~~f~cult to ~amp(y ~thn As a resu.t~ p continued to build resident9al and avoid the risk of building carnr~ercial ar rni~ed usedQ ~n ~oo~ ~arrbora estab6ished a ~iti~ens Advisory ward to reviev~ the ir~~plen~~ntation of the area lan NSA~~R ~Narthern Study Area ~rnpler~entation ~evie~r Camn~ittee of h~ch ~ gas a p rner~~er~ ~'~ give the beard tune to da their pork, Carrbora placed a rnoratariurn an applications far ne~ de~re(aprnent. `the Committee gas a ~Qmbinatian ~fto~rn ~'esidents end NSA har~eo~nersa ~t gas charged pith revie~in rnodificatians to (and use ardinana~ and coning map in order to h+elp.achieve the NSA g plan's gads and objectives one of the outcomes of the Cor~raittee's ~ar~ was to do ~~ray with the fleeting zones and s ecificall identify where a ~il(ge Frith carnrnercia( cornpone~tt could be acceptable. This x R redefined acreage thresholds and other aspects of V~~ ~~~llage ~i~~ed Use}, one of the carnr~ittee recarnmendations gas to have public Workshops in arderto incarparate nnore NSA residents ~rithin the revie~ process ~a date ~arrbara has conducted three ~~arl~shops an this sub'ecta Tea ~rerei in ~oD~ and the most recent this past Saturdays ~arrboro is moving .from conditional use to mare traditional planning that uses neighborhood in ut as the basis far (ang terra Land use planning and re~or~ing ifJas appropriates it's a ~~n/~in p scenario; nei hbors can discuss their priorities and concerns up franc ~- before there's any 9 discussion of develaprner~tn ~t reduces risk far develapcrs ~rha understand zaning~ it's similar to grange County's Small Area Manning processn (hopefully Carrbaro's experience effete insight can help grange Cour~typ ~'r~ Oath Kaufman ar~d ~ live in the Northern ~`ransition Area, rhich is pa~c of Carrbora's tannin "urisdictian~ As you kna~ Carrbara has conditional districts every~rhere ands as a p ~~ result every residential community nom feels vulnerable to incar~patible developrnent~ ~ can~munit , at old ~~ and ~.ucy sane is adjacent to the NE corner of Eubanks and ~!d ~~ ~- k ! ~~ +hich Carrboro grants to re~ane. then ~rere sere ~nv~ted to an all day ne~ghborhaod nneeting" ~ last Saturday ~e feared that eve ~rauld be under pressure to respond to a develo mast ro veal far the parcel ~ including a rezoning using a conditions! district4 p p p e learned instead that the r~eeting vas .intended to e~plare options to re~ane the area ~ and has invited the neighbors and the developer to participatep e appreciate Carrbora making an effort to hear from neighbors prior to any specific development praposais being afferedo dime gill tell if these advanced planing steps ail! lead to development processes that are less cantentiaus, but this is at least a step in th.~ right directian~