Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2012 3:53:44 PM
Creation date
4/1/2011 11:23:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/5/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-05-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
ORD-2011-013 Unified Development Ordinance and Repeal All Existing Ordinances See ON line Version
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-032 Resolution Adopting a Unified Development Ordinance and Repeal All Prior Existing UDO Ordinances
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.... .. X44 <br />cam: [icated and challenoir~~ to understand and the staff dEd their best to ansv~er our guestians. <br />p -~ <br />The staff reassured us that this nee proposal ~erel~ repac[~ages the existing ordinance pith nee <br />tern~ino[o ~ ~n stud in the proposal further, ~ fine than are n~an~ areas where she <br />~~ ~ ~ 4 ~cess <br />re lacernent of eneral use districts ~~~tr~ conditions[ districts ~oo!d bring about a nee pr <br />p w- ~• 'ions[ use can be a valuable <br />ar~d oten~~a[I~ d~fr~erent results from the current ard~nancea €~nd~t <br />p lected ward, ~or~ever it is not a too[ <br />tool because case specific conditions can be set b~ the ~ p <br />to be [aced ever~~~here~ such as in the rural buffer ar Watershed critical areas or in rr~a~r~ areas <br />~~nin chan es are not a ra riate~ ~t v~ould be most usefui in areas There large scale <br />~rhere g 9 pp ~ <br />econonnic development is detern~lned to be desired b~ the cen~~unit~. <br />dditian the eor~dltional use caning, as, proposed to apply to the entire County outside the <br />~n a a Which <br />n~unici alines, ~u[d uncut the purposes of the Can~prehens~ve flan and ~an~ng rn p <br />P Cou t ~ The Ca~nrnissian ~rould be <br />serve as a structure f or the colloctive aspirations of the n ~` <br />ise far more discretion en the appropriateness of uses and the appiicatian of <br />compelled to e~erc <br />ver[a pones such as the Critical watershed overlay Districts in and given areal ~ believe the <br />o ~ <br />ublic ~rou[d be frustrated b~ an unpredictable er~viror~ment and a much less transparent Count <br />~ . <br />process <br />~n ~QVember of ~~~~ the chapel ~li[l Council, cons9dered a hand Use ~anagernent ~rd~nance <br />Test amendment that ~uould create special residential standard conditional coning districts to <br />sate a net tool to allov~ increased densities in specific areas in To~no These panes ~~auld be <br />cr <br />a lied within ~ pones, including the Do~nton~ This nee ~onir~g district auld al~pl~ if the <br />pp als such as affordable housin <br />~auncEl.dec"riled ~n applicant's request.r~et certain go d g~ <br />t ens `artation rotection of the natural environment, protection of neighborhoods and the <br />r p , ' p ~ ~ ~ eras re uired tv accorn an the <br />pron~ot~on of ecnonr~~c v~tal~t~. ~n add~t~on, a special use perrn~t g . p ~ <br />application <br />~ a el dill citi~e~s e~~,'~.J~*ressed considerable vulnerabalit~ and concern about the five areas chosen <br />h ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ r <br />for these canditiona[ use districts.and the possibil~t~ that a condit~anal use d~str~ct could be <br />a roved near thenn~ Citizens said that the chapel Hill connrnunity had net decided ~rithin a <br />pp <br />cam reh~ensive fanning recess There such x.75°la density increases belanged~ far the five <br />p p p ~ s ort such <br />selected ~anesl it gas else net clearta them that tl~e infrastructure needed to upp <br />der~S(tles eras ava~lableA <br />~" e Council a reed pith citizen concerns and on November ~~, 2~~8, the Council voted to apply <br />h g <br />he new condit'[Qnal use district Qn[~r to the Da~rnto~un District i~(a~or i~o~ rrrade the pant that <br />eras the ono area ~rhere the community agreed densities belanged~ The ~rideatape is available <br />here htt ~ cha elhil[. ranicus.car~ ~fedia~la er. h ?view id~~~xcli id-~7~ <br />that ~e can learn Here are three paints <br />Carrirnunities need to agree on There density belongs before nee pones and districts are <br />approved <br />residential and Carn~mercial uses donut have to be combined in one ~pne~ <br />Citizens and developers grant predictability in how their comrnunit~ gross <br />~ believe these e~c eriences are relevant to your decisions on the proposed ~D~a <br />p <br />Tl~ar~k you for your cansideratian of these points. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.