Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011
>
Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2012 3:53:44 PM
Creation date
4/1/2011 11:23:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/5/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-05-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
ORD-2011-013 Unified Development Ordinance and Repeal All Existing Ordinances See ON line Version
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-032 Resolution Adopting a Unified Development Ordinance and Repeal All Prior Existing UDO Ordinances
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />~ a that e are got anti-~de~~iap~~nt ~ ~~ are anti spra~ulp e b~iie~e that thie U~~ <br />lease kn <br />nd yell defined conditional districts ill make it easier to attract the development ~ Santa <br />a <br />con~n~en~s ~ are carnn~i~ed to pork pith the county and tl~e panning <br />~f you agree nth Bur <br />board to correct the phase ~ ~~ a,nd rnave quickly onto phase ~g <br />~~~~ . <br />~~~~~~~~ <br />' the Januar ~~t~ ublic information session and generally feeBing aver~heln~ed <br />ftar at~end~ng y p ~ ~ of <br />c m legit of the ~~~~ ~ decided to read al[ ~~~ pages of the document plus ~.rt~ci <br />b~ the o p ~ ~ Bet ~~ith Crai <br />the currant ordinance plus a[1 punning ward rn~nutes related to this topic and m g <br />"ct to re~ie~v rn uestEOns: I find the over°all approach to the ~~~ to be sound and <br />~ened~ ~' q <br />' e t at the i~ lementation of Canditi®nal districts is a significant irnpro~ement in the <br />believ h p <br />~~~~ .ice ~ artpcularl~ aoarec[ate the ability to limit uses and specify candrtions. ~ else <br />*.~ a r..c p i a ~l.u n e ~ p ~ i f w <br />believe that it mill help us take an important step farrard n our efforts to improve ecanorn~c <br />ent in the ~conan~ic ~eveiopnnent ~istricts~ car~rnerciai zones and highay corridorsA <br />develaprn . <br />concern about hog the Canditionai honing districts relate ~pecificaily to <br />'Ha~Vever~ T da ha~re a , <br />the rota[ con~n~unlty~ <br />~ detern~ir~ed that the language that identified specific requirements for appropriate <br />ed deve[a rnent frdrn article 7 of the existing ordinance has been eliminated in the <br />plann p elo rent <br />~~qu This lan cage expEained hove things like industrial or cvn~mercial dev p <br />g <br />~[d be laced hear transportation corridors and public utility services It is this <br />sho p ~ ter and <br />lah ua e that clarified hoer the ~conornic ~evelopn~ent districts differ ~n charac <br />g g `stir~ctions have no~u been lost pith <br />ur~ose fr~rr~ the rural areas Unfortunately, those d~ <br />p <br />. the elimination of these in~pertant elements. <br />sa determined that mast categories of planned development have bean cornhined into <br />al nt <br />sin ie Conditional Qistrict Balled Master Sian ~evelapment or MP~wC~~ ~~ve d~ffere <br />a g <br />fanned ~~~ districts including industrial, comrnerciai, residentialp n~i~ed use, and <br />office institutional have been combined into this single district ~t a[lav~s virtually any use, <br />N M <br />includin li ht medium and heavy industr~ala ~n ghat ~ believe to be an adrr~in~str ative <br />g ~ r <br />o~ersi ht n~an ages of specific requirements for these five planned develaprnent types <br />g ~ p ~ ~.5 a es of s ecific <br />here not incorporated into the ~1~C ~n any ~raya ~n fact, close to p g p <br />re uirer~ents ~rere left out end this deletion eras net visible as a change ~n contrast, <br />q <br />ed Develo rr~ent for Mobile Homo darks eras given its Q~n conditional district ~1~~1PM <br />Piann p R t' e <br />~~ and ~.~ a es of s ecr`~c standards sere included The consal~dat~an of r~u[ Cpl <br />districts into l~P~-C~ has created a single nne size its all salut~on that down t , <br />adequately serve the rural corn~tunity~ <br />'all the re uirernent for a spec[al use permit has been removed, before the Heads <br />end fxn y, q <br />f the torsi community have been reflected in the definit[on of the Conditional honing <br />0 <br />~EstrE ctsx <br />se each rezonin decision v~i[i depend on the preferences of the sitting beard -- and ~e , <br />~f coot f ~ ~ ~ Save fan and <br />a reciate that this hoard is generally commuted to ~n~plerr~ent~ng the con~preh n p. <br />pp e b atchin the Chatham County <br />protecting rural character ~ but as We've learn d ~ g , <br />Commissioners eve election cycle can bring rna~Qr shifts in carnposition and our zoning <br />f <br />ordinances are meant to sn~aoth out these political. changes. <br />a irnum fle~ibilit for the ED~s v~hich use strongly support, but it can be <br />MF~~C~ offers ~ x y <br />' Tied in the rural areas where anyone can seek a rezoning on a parcel as small as ~ acres <br />rn~sapp <br />for a use that`s i~cornpatible pith the surrounding area e donrt have pater, surer, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.