Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~~~'~ Samantha Cabe: I have two questions, first of all, da we want non planners making revisions to this and number two can we really say that we are not going to lack at it if we serve at their pleasure if they tell us we have to look at it? Brian Crawford: v~e[I at same point we have to make a statement. 4f course we can be removed, we serve at their pleasure. Judith v~egner: C. we can resign. Samantha Cabe: ! uess m recommendation would be, I think it would be more straightforward if we just send it... our g Y recammendatian is that we are sending this back as the completed Phase 1 and we recommend that the Commissioners vats to approve it or to not approve it period. That would be my version of that. Judith v~egner: Let's take her version. Rachel Hawkins. Since we have had so much discussion about the Comprehensive [^'lan and from What I could gather in my layman's way, everything that the Planning ~ Board and the planning department has done has been in consensus with the Comprehensive Plan sa if they are seeing things that they don't think work or whatever they just need to refer back to the Comprehensive Plan far that question. As I said before, I don't think anything will get by the planning department ar put in an area where it didn't need to be put. I~aTio~: Samantha Cabe moved that the Planning Board make a recammendatian to the Board of County Commissioners to accept the UD4 as amended tonight by the Planning Board as the final output of Phase 1 and vote either to approve this dacumentor not approve this document. May Becker: I feel that the part about... if same Commissioner has a concern ar a modification, I feel if that is in response to a public comment ar something that has came about as a result of such discussion that it should be communicated back to us. In other wards, I feel that if it's a yes ar na and there is same modification that should be communicated then that should be included in whatever,..... Samantha Cabe: Can I make one clarification? I am not changing the language in my matian but that's the whale paint of Phase 2, There are still going to be modifications to this document that will be ongoing and yes they can send it to us but send it to us after you approve it or you don't approve it. Because we can vote to make those amendments ~n Phase ~. Alan Campbell: I second Samantha's matian. Brian Crawford: Samantha's matian has been made and seconded the questions is I think May wants a friendly amendment. Samantha Cabe: I say na Brian Crawford: Is there a second to May's proposal? Brian Crawford: Seeing that there is na second the existing matian stands. MOTION: Samantha Cabe moved that the Planning Board make a recammendatian to the Board of County Commissioners to accept the UD4 as amended tonight by the Planning Board as the final output of Phase 1 and vote either to approve this document or not approve this document. Seconded by Alan Campbell ~OTE~ $-1 Becker opposed Judith v~egner, Thank you to the staff and I have to say that l think of Mary Babbitt-Cooke tonight and knave she did a lot to help us through this as well. Brian Crawford: Thank you everyone for all the hard work in getting through this process. AGENDA ITEM ~: U®~ I~~~EMENTATION ~RlOGE STATUS REPORT: To receive a status report from Clarion Associates on its progress towards completing the Implementation Bridge document and provide any preliminary Board input. Presenter: Roger U~a~c!an, C1arr`ar~ Assoc~afes . ~Z4 ~5