Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~ ~~~ 11 Commissioner Gordan at the November Public Hearing, 8.~, she Wanted the phrase "including uses" inserted and the other ane is in number 2, We inadverten'Jy forgot to strike something and We don't want it to end up in the UDG. Brian Crawford: I'm glad you caught that, that's a big one. ~aT~a~; Judith Wegner maned that the Planning Baard appro~~e staff's recommendation regarding Section 3.1.3 and Section 4,4.4 ~B} of the draft UDO. Seconded by Samantha Cabe ~1oT~: Unanimaus i~o~~o~~: Judith Wegner moved that the Planning Board recommend the UDa Phase 1 with the amendments recommended tonight to the Commissioners for action. 1Vlay BeckerR For consideration one way or another? Judith 1~egner: I was gaing to hold that part off and do it separately. Brian Ciawrard. So ane that We n~~ve ii? Judith vUegner; ane that we move it to the Commissioners with the adopted amendments far their action. day Beckerr Ok, I just wanted to be clear on what we were voting an. ~1D`r14N~ Judith Wegner moved that an behalf of the Planning Board to the Board of County Commissioners that the Planning Baard recommends off rmatively that they act upon the UDC Phase 1 with the amendments agreed upon tonight. Seconded by Alan Campbell. ~or~: Unanimaus ~oT10~~ Judith vUegner moved that the Planning Board urges the Board of County Commissioners to vote the UDa up ar down because further delay is not constructive in the Planning Board's viewpoint and that the Planning Board urges that the Baard of Gaunty Commissioners bring closure to this ane way or another so that the Planning Board can move an to Phase 2 auspiciously. lUfay Becker ! have a question, when you say up ar dawn, would that be presumably if there is some concern that they have then they could say up or dawn with the fallowing being addressed? Judith ~legner~ ~k, let me try it one mare time. i~o~~a~: Judith 1~egner moved that on behalf of the Planning Board they urge the Commissioners that the Planning Board has completed their best work an this project to their best abilityt The Planning Baard believes that it Would be constructive for the Baard of County Commissioners to either vote in favor. or vote against or that they take whatever other action they want to amend whatever the Planning Board has sent forward but that they not send it back to the Planning Baard far more refinement because the Planning Baard has done its level best to give them their best judgment and that it would be much mare in the public interest far them to go ahead and make a decision including further revisions if they choose to do that but that in the opinion of the Planning Baard it is mat constructive to keep sending it back to the Planning Baard without same sense of What the Commissioners collectively want to have happen. Brian Crawford: lt's longer than I wanted but the point is well taken that we Want to send it fio them and let them know that we are mat willing to revisit Phase 1. Again, We've made our recommendatiari, we've done our best thinking on this and We feel Please 1 is finished. vve are gaing to send it to you, We urge you to vote it up ar down. Nat get to a meeting and suggest further revisions, ifyau suggest further revisions, we're mat gaing to lack at them. If 1 get removed as Chair, that's fine, the Whole point is we can't keep gaing through this. We just have to make it unequivocal that they need to vote up or down on Whether they Want Please 1. Judith v~egner 4r modify if they choose to do that but mat to send it back here again because We have done our level best. Brian CraWfard~ That's the paint I Want to get across, I don't want them to think that We are Willing to look at more revisions or edits on this. I4