Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~~~~ only to Economic Development Districts and Rural Community Nodes, Ulle have talked about that so that is the response, Number 4, Supermajarity, as to supermajority requirements, my opinion for what it's worth is that would not comport with the statute because there is na provision far supermajority sa Commissioner Gordon can get the legislature to change that but it's not up to us. Number ~, we just talked about ground absorption systems and wastewater treatment facilities and I think that's been well answered by the staff Number 6, Issues related to the Rural Buffer and Joint Planning Agreement. well once upon a time I was on the Garrboro Board of Alderman and actually put that together so I have some vague recollection but it may be that in my increasing age i've forgotten. Nonetheless, a, no Conditional Districts in the rural buffer as previously noted, the rural buffer doesn't have economic development districts ar community nodes, there is nv Public Interest Conditional District any mare the only possibility would be mobile Names which in my mind would be consistentwith the rural buffer if that happened to exist. b, No Conditional Districts in watershed overlay districts, I think we've just talked about that and it's in the record thatwhere any of these v~ould exist, it's not in watershed districts. c. Conditional Districts, she wants Conditional Districts move to Phase 2, bell, she can convince her colleagues, that's up to her that's not up to us. Number 7, a, She wants to have references to about quarterly hearing dates. In my opinion that doesn't belong in this kind of ordinance so she can do it in Commissioners" meeting if she would like that, b. She asked that public interest districts should remain in general use zoned districts that's what we've done, Number 8, She wants something else far the references to the Comprehensive Plan and land Use Category butwe discussed than Judith Wegner: That is my summary that i would like to have if you all agree to it that it's fully laid out in the minutes with our best wishes. MoTlo~: tarry Wright moved that the Planning Board agrees with Judith's assessment, Seconded by Alan Campbell, UDT~~ Unanimous . Judith 1Negner: I just want to be sure, again this is so we've done this a[I fully as best we can any other things raised in the summary, the town resolution, the citizen written submittals, l think a number of these we have addressed since the staff had in fact pulled out the major themes here, I think same of them don't necessa~iljr reflect a foil understanding of what is in the actual document but as best !can see we really have tried systematically to answer those and I think we should thank the staff far having done such a careful jab by pulling these... Brian Crawford: I also sent the staff, earlier today, something tram Orange County Voice which I believe, I've looked at this list and I think it's been incorporated in some of the Wark that they did making these suggestions, Judith Wegner: [ think we should extend our thanks to them because I think they really have worked very hard to try to raise important issues here. Larry Wright: They made a very good presentation, Judith I~egner: I just wanted to be sure it's in the record that we went through all the paper and all the emails. Craig Benedict: (believe you voted an amendments and now those amendments can be wrapped into the global UDO and then there can be a global vote an the UDa as amended. I'erdita Holtz: There's still one attachment in your regular packet, Attachment 2, its page 23 of your Planning Board packet, Staff found two additional necessary revisions after your February meeting and they are in purple text, Gne was requested by ~~ ~3